Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Emery, S
Right arrow Articles by Pierce, J P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Emery, S
Right arrow Articles by Pierce, J P
Tobacco Control 2002;11:130-134
© 2002 Tobacco Control


RESEARCH PAPER

Was there significant tax evasion after the 1999 50 cent per pack cigarette tax increase in California?

S Emery,*, M M White, E A Gilpin, J P Pierce

Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA

Correspondence to:
John P Pierce, PhD, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0645, USA;
jppierce{at}ucsd.edu

Objectives: Several states, including California, have implemented large cigarette excise tax increases, which may encourage smokers to purchase their cigarettes in other lower taxed states, or from other lower or non-taxed sources. Such tax evasion thwarts tobacco control objectives and may cost the state substantial tax revenues. Thus, this study investigates the extent of tax evasion in the 6–12 months after the implementation of California's $0.50/pack excise tax increase.

Design and setting: Retrospective data analysis from the 1999 California Tobacco Surveys (CTS), a random digit dialled telephone survey of California households.

Main outcome measures: Sources of cigarettes, average daily cigarette consumption, and reported price paid.

Results: Very few (5.1 (0.7)% (±95% confidence limits)) of California smokers avoided the excise tax by usually purchasing cigarettes from non- or lower taxed sources, such as out-of-state outlets, military commissaries, or the internet. The vast majority of smokers purchased their cigarettes from the most convenient and expensive sources: convenience stores/gas (petrol) stations (45.0 (1.9)%), liquor/drug stores (16.4 (1.6)%), and supermarkets (8.8 (1.2)%).

Conclusions: Despite the potential savings, tax evasion by individual smokers does not appear to pose a serious threat to California's excise tax revenues or its tobacco control objectives.


Keywords: California cigarette excise tax; tax revenues; price sensitivity




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
D. Shelley, M. J. Cantrell, J. Moon-Howard, D. Q. Ramjohn, and N. VanDevanter
The $5 Man: The Underground Economic Response to a Large Cigarette Tax Increase in New York City
Am J Public Health, August 1, 2007; 97(8): 1483 - 1488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
I. C. Scarinci, A. F. Silveira, D. F. dos Santos, and B. M. Beech
Sociocultural factors associated with cigarette smoking among women in Brazilian worksites: a qualitative study
Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2007; 22(2): 146 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
A Hyland, F L Laux, C Higbee, G Hastings, H Ross, F J Chaloupka, G T Fong, and K M Cummings
Cigarette purchase patterns in four countries and the relationship with cessation: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey
Tob. Control, June 1, 2006; 15(suppl_3): iii59 - iii64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
A. J. Taylor, M. Langdon, and P. Campion
Smuggled tobacco, deprivation and addiction
Eur J Public Health, August 1, 2005; 15(4): 399 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
A. Hyland, C. Higbee, Q. Li, J. E. Bauer, G. A. Giovino, T. Alford, and K. M. Cummings
Access to Low-Taxed Cigarettes Deters Smoking Cessation Attempts
Am J Public Health, June 1, 2005; 95(6): 994 - 995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
H.-Y. Sung, T.-w. Hu, M. Ong, T. E. Keeler, and M.-l. Sheu
A Major State Tobacco Tax Increase, the Master Settlement Agreement, and Cigarette Consumption: The California Experience
Am J Public Health, June 1, 2005; 95(6): 1030 - 1035.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
A Hyland, J E Bauer, Q Li, S M Abrams, C Higbee, L Peppone, and K M Cummings
Higher cigarette prices influence cigarette purchase patterns
Tob. Control, April 1, 2005; 14(2): 86 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
M Hrywna, C D Delnevo, and D Staniewska
Prevalence and correlates of internet cigarette purchasing among adult smokers in New Jersey
Tob. Control, September 1, 2004; 13(3): 296 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
K M Ribisl
The potential of the internet as a medium to encourage and discourage youth tobacco use
Tob. Control, June 1, 2003; 12(90001): i48 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Conclusions are somewhat correct
Joseph L. McFarland
Tobacco Control Online, 27 Sep 2003 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.