Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Tobacco Control 2002;11:376-378; doi:10.1136/tc.11.4.376
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Tobacco Control 2002;11:376-378
© 2002 Tobacco Control

BRIEF REPORT

Acute effects of AdvanceTM: a potential reduced exposure product for smokers

A B Breland, S E Evans, A R Buchhalter and T Eissenberg

Department of Psychology and Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Thomas Eissenberg, PhD, Department of Psychology and Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Box 980205, Richmond, VA 23298-0205, USA;
teissenb{at}vcu.edu

ABSTRACT

Objective: To examine the acute effects of AdvanceTM, a potential reduced exposure product (PREP) for smokers marketed as a means to reduce exposure to toxic gases and tobacco specific nitrosamines.

Design, setting, participants: Latin square ordered, three condition, laboratory based, crossover design with 20 smokers of light or ultra-light cigarettes (15 or more cigarettes/day). In each 2.5 hour condition, participants completed an 8-puff smoking bout from their own brand, AdvanceTM, or an unlit cigarette (that is, sham smoking) every 30 minutes for a total of four bouts.

Main outcome measures: Subject rated measures of tobacco/nicotine withdrawal; carbon monoxide (CO), and heart rate; plasma nicotine concentrations.

Results: Relative to own brand, AdvanceTM produced similar withdrawal suppression and heart rate increase, lower CO boost, and higher plasma nicotine concentrations.

Conclusions: PREPs for smokers need to be evaluated using a comprehensive strategy that includes empirical examination of acute and long term effects. Adequate withdrawal suppression and potentially lower concentrations of CO associated with AdvanceTM use are positive factors, although higher nicotine concentrations do not constitute "reduced exposure". Overall, longer exposure periods are necessary to determine carcinogen delivery. PREP evaluation is complex and should be completed objectively.

Keywords: AdvanceTM; potential reduced exposure product

Abbreviations: CO, carbon monoxide; HR, heart rate; HSD, honestly significant difference; IPI, interpuff interval; NS, non-significant; PREP, potential reduced exposure product; QSU, questionnaire of smoking urges; TSNs, tobacco specific nitrosamines; VAS, visual analogue scale


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Eissenberg, T (2006). The time for tobacco industry sponsored PREP evaluation has arrived. Tobacco Control 15: 1-2 [Full Text]  
  • Breland, A B, Acosta, M C, Eissenberg, T (2003). Tobacco specific nitrosamines and potential reduced exposure products for smokers: a preliminary evaluation of AdvanceTM. Tobacco Control 12: 317-321 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Farone, W A (2002). Harm reduction: 25 years later. Tobacco Control 11: 287-288 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.