HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cummings, K M Articles by Hyland, A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cummings, K M Articles by Hyland, A

Failed promises of the cigarette industry and its effect on consumer misperceptions about the health risks of smoking

Department of Cancer Prevention, Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, New York 14263, USA

Correspondence to:
Michael Cummings, PhD, MPH, Department of Cancer Prevention, Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, New York 14263, USA;
Michael.Cummings{at}Roswellpark.org

ABSTRACT
Background: In January 1954, US tobacco manufacturers jointly sponsored an advocacy advertisement entitled "A Frank Statement to Cigarette Smokers" which appeared in 448 newspapers in 258 cities reaching an estimated 43 245 000 Americans. The advertisement questioned research findings implicating smoking as a cause of cancer, promised consumers that their cigarettes were safe, and pledged to support impartial research to investigate allegations that smoking was harmful to human health.

Objective: To examine (1) the extent to which cigarette companies fulfilled the promises made to consumers in the 1954 "Frank Statement", and (2) the effect of these promises on consumer knowledge, beliefs, and smoking practices.

Methods: This study reviews statements made since 1954 by the tobacco companies individually and collectively through the Tobacco Institute and Tobacco Industry Research Committee/Council for Tobacco Research on the subject of smoking as a cause disease, and the industry's pledge to support and disclose the results of impartial research on smoking and health. Many of the industry documents evaluated in this study were obtained from a collection consisting of 116 documents entitled the "Statement of Defendants' Misrepresentations" prepared by attorneys representing the state of Connecticut in the Medicaid litigation against the tobacco industry in 1998. In addition, we searched for corroborating material from tobacco industry documents collected from the tobacco industry's document websites. In order to contrast industry statements on smoking and health with what smokers' actually believed about smoking we reviewed reports of public polling data on smokers' knowledge and beliefs about smoking and disease gathered from tobacco industry sources and from surveys conducted by public health researchers.

Results: Analysis of public statements issued by the tobacco industry sources over the past five decades shows that the companies maintained the stance that smoking had not been proven to be injurious to health through 1999. The public statements of the tobacco industry are in sharp contrast to the private views expressed by many of their own scientists. The tobacco documents reveal that many scientists within the tobacco industry acknowledged as early as the 1950s that cigarette smoking was unsafe. The sincerity of the industry's promise to support research to find out if smoking was harmful to health and to disclose information about the health effects of smoking can also be questioned based upon the industry's own documents which reveal: (1) scepticism about the scientific value of the smoking and health research program established by the industry; and (2) evidence that research findings implicating smoking as a health problem were often not published or disclosed outside the industry. Industry documents also show that the companies knew that their own customers were misinformed about smoking and health issues.

Conclusion: It is clear that the cigarette companies failed to fulfill the promises made to consumers in the 1954 "Frank Statement" advertisement. The failure of cigarette manufacturers to honour these promises has resulted in a public that even today remains misinformed about the health risks of smoking.

Keywords: health risks; consumers; tobacco industry

Abbreviations: CTR, Council for Tobacco Research; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; RFP, request for production; SAB, scientific advisory board; TIRC, Tobacco Industry Research Committee

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S Braun, R Mejia, P M Ling, and E J Perez-Stable Tobacco industry targeting youth in Argentina Tob. Control, April 1, 2008; 17(2): 111 - 117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Derry and S. V. Waikar Frames and Filters: Strategic Distrust as a Legitimation Tool in the 50-Year Battle Between Public Health Activists and Big Tobacco Business Society, March 1, 2008; 47(1): 102 - 139. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. M. Cummings, A. Brown, and R. O'Connor The Cigarette Controversy Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2007; 16(6): 1070 - 1076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Milberger, R. M Davis, C. E Douglas, J. K Beasley, D. Burns, T. Houston, and D. Shopland Tobacco manufacturers' defence against plaintiffs' claims of cancer causation: throwing mud at the wall and hoping some of it will stick Tob. Control, December 1, 2006; 15(suppl_4): iv17 - iv26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K M. Cummings, A. Brown, and C. E Douglas Consumer acceptable risk: how cigarette companies have responded to accusations that their products are defective Tob. Control, December 1, 2006; 15(suppl_4): iv84 - iv89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. F. Wayne Potential reduced exposure products (PREPs) in industry trial testimony Tob. Control, December 1, 2006; 15(suppl_4): iv90 - iv97. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D Hammond, G T Fong, A McNeill, R Borland, and K M Cummings Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey Tob. Control, June 1, 2006; 15(suppl_3): iii19 - iii25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J Dunsby and L Bero A nicotine delivery device without the nicotine? Tobacco industry development of low nicotine cigarettes Tob. Control, December 1, 2004; 13(4): 362 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K Alechnowicz and S Chapman The Philippine tobacco industry: "the strongest tobacco lobby in Asia" Tob. Control, December 1, 2004; 13(suppl_2): ii71 - ii78. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Tofler and S Chapman "Some convincing arguments to pass back to nervous customers": the role of the tobacco retailer in the Australian tobacco industry's smoker reassurance campaign 1950-1978 Tob. Control, December 1, 2003; 12(90003): iii7 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K M Cummings A promise is a promise Tob. Control, June 1, 2003; 12(2): 117 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K M Cummings and R W Pollay Exposing Mr Butts' tricks of the trade Tob. Control, March 1, 2002; 11(90001): i1 - 4. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J L Pauly, A B Mepani, J D Lesses, K M Cummings, and R J Streck Cigarettes with defective filters marketed for 40 years: what Philip Morris never told smokers Tob. Control, March 1, 2002; 11(90001): i51 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]