Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kozlowski, L T
Right arrow Articles by O'Connor, R J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kozlowski, L T
Right arrow Articles by O'Connor, R J
Tobacco Control 2002;11:i40-i50
© 2002 Tobacco Control


Article

Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents

L T Kozlowski, R J O'Connor

Department of Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, USA

Correspondence to:
Lynn T Kozlowski, PhD, Department of Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, 315 East Henderson Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA;
ltk1{at}psu.edu


ABSTRACT
Objective: To review tobacco industry documents on filter ventilation in light of published studies and to explore the role of filter ventilation in the design of cigarettes that deliver higher smoke yields to smokers than would be expected from standard machine smoked tests (Federal Trade Commission (FTC), International Organization for Standardization (ISO)).

Data sources: Searched from November 1999 to November 2000 internet databases of industry documents (www.pmdocs.com, www.rjrtdocs.com, www.lorillarddocs.com, www.bw.aalatg.com, www.cdc.gov/tobacco/industrydocs, www.tobaccodocuments.org, www.tobaccopapers.org, www.hlth.gov.bc.ca/Guildford, www.cctc.ca/ncth/Guildford, www.cctc.ca/ncth/Guildford2) for documents related to filter ventilation. Documents found dated from 1955 through 1994.

Study selection: Those documents judged to contain the most relevant information or data on filter ventilation related to cigarette taste and compensatory smoking, while also trying to avoid redundancy from various documents deriving from the same underlying data.

Data synthesis: Filter ventilation is a crucial design feature creating three main problems for lower tar cigarettes as measured by official smoking machine testing. Firstly, it misleadingly makes cigarettes taste lighter and milder, and, therefore, they appear less dangerous to smokers. Secondly, it promotes compensation mainly by facilitating the taking of larger puffs. Thirdly, for very heavily ventilated cigarettes (that is, > 65% filter air dilution), behavioural blocking of vents with lips or fingers is an additional contributor to compensatory smoking. These three effects are found in industry research as well as published research.

Conclusions: Filter ventilation is a dangerous, defective technology that should be abandoned in less hazardous nicotine delivery systems. Health interested groups should test cigarettes in a way that reflects compensatory smoking. Lower tar (vented filter) cigarettes should be actively countermarketed.


Keywords: filter ventilation, compensation; vent blocking

Abbreviations: BAT, British American Tobacco; FTC, Federal Trade Commission; HSS, human smoking simulator; ISO, International Organization for Standardization; PM, Philip Morris Tobacco Company; PPU, puffing power units; RTD, resistance to draw; SPT, stain pattern technique; TPM, total particulate matter




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
R J O'Connor and P J Hurley
Existing technologies to reduce specific toxicant emissions in cigarette smoke
Tob. Control, September 1, 2008; 17(Suppl_1): i39 - i48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
R Borland, G T Fong, H-H Yong, K M Cummings, D Hammond, B King, M Siahpush, A McNeill, G Hastings, R J O'Connor, et al.
What happened to smokers' beliefs about light cigarettes when "light/mild" brand descriptors were banned in the UK? Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey
Tob. Control, August 1, 2008; 17(4): 256 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
R. Derry and S. V. Waikar
Frames and Filters: Strategic Distrust as a Legitimation Tool in the 50-Year Battle Between Public Health Activists and Big Tobacco
Business Society, March 1, 2008; 47(1): 102 - 139.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
K. M. Cummings, A. Brown, and R. O'Connor
The Cigarette Controversy
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2007; 16(6): 1070 - 1076.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
D. Hammond, F. Wiebel, L. T Kozlowski, R. Borland, K M. Cummings, R. J O'Connor, A. McNeill, G. N Connolly, D. Arnott, and G. T Fong
Revising the machine smoking regime for cigarette emissions: implications for tobacco control policy
Tob. Control, February 1, 2007; 16(1): 8 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
K M. Cummings, A. Brown, and C. E Douglas
Consumer acceptable risk: how cigarette companies have responded to accusations that their products are defective
Tob. Control, December 1, 2006; 15(suppl_4): iv84 - iv89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
R. J. O'Connor, G. A. Giovino, L. T. Kozlowski, S. Shiffman, A. Hyland, J. T. Bernert, R. S. Caraballo, and K. M. Cummings
Changes in Nicotine Intake and Cigarette Use Over Time in Two Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Samples of Smokers
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 15, 2006; 164(8): 750 - 759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
N. Gray
The consequences of the unregulated cigarette.
Tob. Control, October 1, 2006; 15(5): 405 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
D. Hammond, G. T. Fong, K. M. Cummings, R. J. O'Connor, G. A. Giovino, and A. McNeill
Cigarette yields and human exposure: a comparison of alternative testing regimens.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2006; 15(8): 1495 - 1501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
L T Kozlowski, R J O'Connor, G A Giovino, C A Whetzel, J Pauly, and K M Cummings
Maximum yields might improve public health--if filter vents were banned: a lesson from the history of vented filters
Tob. Control, June 1, 2006; 15(3): 262 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
R. J O'Connor, K M. Cummings, G. A Giovino, A. McNeill, and L. T Kozlowski
How did UK cigarette makers reduce tar to 10 mg or less?
BMJ, February 4, 2006; 332(7536): 302 - 302.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. S Gill and F. O'May
People seem confused about sensible drinking messages
BMJ, February 4, 2006; 332(7536): 302 - 303.
[Full Text]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
R S Caraballo, L L Pederson, and N Gupta
New tobacco products: do smokers like them?
Tob. Control, February 1, 2006; 15(1): 39 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
D. Hammond, G. T. Fong, K. M. Cummings, and A. Hyland
Smoking Topography, Brand Switching, and Nicotine Delivery: Results from an In vivo Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2005; 14(6): 1370 - 1375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
N Gray, J E Henningfield, N L Benowitz, G N Connolly, C Dresler, K Fagerstrom, M J Jarvis, and P Boyle
Toward a comprehensive long term nicotine policy
Tob. Control, June 1, 2005; 14(3): 161 - 165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. J. O'Connor, J. P. Stitt, and L. T. Kozlowski
A Digital Image Analysis System for Identifying Filter Vent Blocking on Ultralight Cigarettes
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2005; 14(2): 533 - 537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
L T Kozlowski, N A Dreschel, S D Stellman, J Wilkenfeld, E B Weiss, and M E Goldberg
An extremely compensatible cigarette by design: documentary evidence on industry awareness and reactions to the Barclay filter design cheating the tar testing system
Tob. Control, February 1, 2005; 14(1): 64 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
N Gray and P Boyle
The case of the disappearing nitrosamines: a potentially global phenomenon
Tob. Control, March 1, 2004; 13(1): 13 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
R Borland
A strategy for controlling the marketing of tobacco products: a regulated market model
Tob. Control, December 1, 2003; 12(4): 374 - 382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
W King, S M Carter, R Borland, S Chapman, and N Gray
The Australian tar derby: the origins and fate of a low tar harm reduction programme
Tob. Control, December 1, 2003; 12(90003): iii61 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
R W Pollay and T Dewhirst
A Premiere example of the illusion of harm reduction cigarettes in the 1990s
Tob. Control, September 1, 2003; 12(3): 322 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
L S Lewis, L T Kozlowski, and R J O'Connor
Filter vent blocking * Authors' reply
Tob. Control, September 1, 2002; 11(3): 285 - 286.
[Full Text]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
K M Cummings and R W Pollay
Exposing Mr Butts' tricks of the trade
Tob. Control, March 1, 2002; 11(90001): i1 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
J L Pauly, A B Mepani, J D Lesses, K M Cummings, and R J Streck
Cigarettes with defective filters marketed for 40 years: what Philip Morris never told smokers
Tob. Control, March 1, 2002; 11(90001): i51 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
K M Cummings, C P Morley, and A Hyland
Failed promises of the cigarette industry and its effect on consumer misperceptions about the health risks of smoking
Tob. Control, March 1, 2002; 11(90001): i110 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.