© 2002 Tobacco Control
Article
Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents
Department of Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, USA
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Lynn T Kozlowski, PhD, Department of Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, 315 East Henderson Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA;
ltk1{at}psu.edu
Objective: To review tobacco industry documents on filter ventilation in light of published studies and to explore the role of filter ventilation in the design of cigarettes that deliver higher smoke yields to smokers than would be expected from standard machine smoked tests (Federal Trade Commission (FTC), International Organization for Standardization (ISO)).
Data sources: Searched from November 1999 to November 2000 internet databases of industry documents (www.pmdocs.com, www.rjrtdocs.com, www.lorillarddocs.com, www.bw.aalatg.com, www.cdc.gov/tobacco/industrydocs, www.tobaccodocuments.org, www.tobaccopapers.org, www.hlth.gov.bc.ca/Guildford, www.cctc.ca/ncth/Guildford, www.cctc.ca/ncth/Guildford2) for documents related to filter ventilation. Documents found dated from 1955 through 1994.
Study selection: Those documents judged to contain the most relevant information or data on filter ventilation related to cigarette taste and compensatory smoking, while also trying to avoid redundancy from various documents deriving from the same underlying data.
Data synthesis: Filter ventilation is a crucial design feature creating three main problems for lower tar cigarettes as measured by official smoking machine testing. Firstly, it misleadingly makes cigarettes taste lighter and milder, and, therefore, they appear less dangerous to smokers. Secondly, it promotes compensation mainly by facilitating the taking of larger puffs. Thirdly, for very heavily ventilated cigarettes (that is, > 65% filter air dilution), behavioural blocking of vents with lips or fingers is an additional contributor to compensatory smoking. These three effects are found in industry research as well as published research.
Conclusions: Filter ventilation is a dangerous, defective technology that should be abandoned in less hazardous nicotine delivery systems. Health interested groups should test cigarettes in a way that reflects compensatory smoking. Lower tar (vented filter) cigarettes should be actively countermarketed.
Keywords: filter ventilation, compensation; vent blocking
Abbreviations: BAT, British American Tobacco; FTC, Federal Trade Commission; HSS, human smoking simulator; ISO, International Organization for Standardization; PM, Philip Morris Tobacco Company; PPU, puffing power units; RTD, resistance to draw; SPT, stain pattern technique; TPM, total particulate matter
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
O'Connor, R J, Hurley, P J
(2008). Existing technologies to reduce specific toxicant emissions in cigarette smoke. Tobacco Control
17: i39-i48
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Borland, R, Fong, G T, Yong, H-H, Cummings, K M, Hammond, D, King, B, Siahpush, M, McNeill, A, Hastings, G, O'Connor, R J, Elton-Marshall, T, Zanna, M P
(2008). What happened to smokers' beliefs about light cigarettes when "light/mild" brand descriptors were banned in the UK? Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tobacco Control
17: 256-262
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Derry, R., Waikar, S. V.
(2008). Frames and Filters: Strategic Distrust as a Legitimation Tool in the 50-Year Battle Between Public Health Activists and Big Tobacco. Business Society
47: 102-139
[Abstract] -
Cummings, K. M., Brown, A., O'Connor, R.
(2007). The Cigarette Controversy. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
16: 1070-1076
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Hammond, D., Wiebel, F., Kozlowski, L. T, Borland, R., Cummings, K M., O'Connor, R. J, McNeill, A., Connolly, G. N, Arnott, D., Fong, G. T
(2007). Revising the machine smoking regime for cigarette emissions: implications for tobacco control policy. Tobacco Control
16: 8-14
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Cummings, K M., Brown, A., Douglas, C. E
(2006). Consumer acceptable risk: how cigarette companies have responded to accusations that their products are defective. Tobacco Control
15: iv84-iv89
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
O'Connor, R. J., Giovino, G. A., Kozlowski, L. T., Shiffman, S., Hyland, A., Bernert, J. T., Caraballo, R. S., Cummings, K. M.
(2006). Changes in Nicotine Intake and Cigarette Use Over Time in Two Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Samples of Smokers. Am J Epidemiol
164: 750-759
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Gray, N.
(2006). The consequences of the unregulated cigarette.. Tobacco Control
15: 405-408
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Hammond, D., Fong, G. T., Cummings, K. M., O'Connor, R. J., Giovino, G. A., McNeill, A.
(2006). Cigarette yields and human exposure: a comparison of alternative testing regimens.. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
15: 1495-1501
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Kozlowski, L T, O'Connor, R J, Giovino, G A, Whetzel, C A, Pauly, J, Cummings, K M
(2006). Maximum yields might improve public health--if filter vents were banned: a lesson from the history of vented filters. Tobacco Control
15: 262-266
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
O'Connor, R. J, Cummings, K M., Giovino, G. A, McNeill, A., Kozlowski, L. T
(2006). How did UK cigarette makers reduce tar to 10 mg or less?. BMJ
332: 302-302
[Full Text] -
Gill, J. S, O'May, F.
(2006). People seem confused about sensible drinking messages. BMJ
332: 302-303
[Full Text] -
Caraballo, R S, Pederson, L L, Gupta, N
(2006). New tobacco products: do smokers like them?. Tobacco Control
15: 39-44
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Hammond, D., Fong, G. T., Cummings, K. M., Hyland, A.
(2005). Smoking Topography, Brand Switching, and Nicotine Delivery: Results from an In vivo Study. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
14: 1370-1375
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Gray, N, Henningfield, J E, Benowitz, N L, Connolly, G N, Dresler, C, Fagerstrom, K, Jarvis, M J, Boyle, P
(2005). Toward a comprehensive long term nicotine policy. Tobacco Control
14: 161-165
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
O'Connor, R. J., Stitt, J. P., Kozlowski, L. T.
(2005). A Digital Image Analysis System for Identifying Filter Vent Blocking on Ultralight Cigarettes. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
14: 533-537
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Kozlowski, L T, Dreschel, N A, Stellman, S D, Wilkenfeld, J, Weiss, E B, Goldberg, M E
(2005). An extremely compensatible cigarette by design: documentary evidence on industry awareness and reactions to the Barclay filter design cheating the tar testing system. Tobacco Control
14: 64-70
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Gray, N, Boyle, P
(2004). The case of the disappearing nitrosamines: a potentially global phenomenon. Tobacco Control
13: 13-16
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Borland, R
(2003). A strategy for controlling the marketing of tobacco products: a regulated market model. Tobacco Control
12: 374-382
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
King, W, Carter, S M, Borland, R, Chapman, S, Gray, N
(2003). The Australian tar derby: the origins and fate of a low tar harm reduction programme. Tobacco Control
12: iii61-70
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Pollay, R W, Dewhirst, T
(2003). A Premiere example of the illusion of harm reduction cigarettes in the 1990s. Tobacco Control
12: 322-332
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Lewis, L S, Kozlowski, L T, O'Connor, R J
(2002). Filter vent blocking * Authors' reply. Tobacco Control
11: 285-286
[Full Text] -
Cummings, K M, Pollay, R W
(2002). Exposing Mr Butts' tricks of the trade. Tobacco Control
11: i1-4
[Full Text] -
Pauly, J L, Mepani, A B, Lesses, J D, Cummings, K M, Streck, R J
(2002). Cigarettes with defective filters marketed for 40 years: what Philip Morris never told smokers. Tobacco Control
11: i51-61
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Cummings, K M, Morley, C P, Hyland, A
(2002). Failed promises of the cigarette industry and its effect on consumer misperceptions about the health risks of smoking. Tobacco Control
11: i110-117
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
