Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cummings, K M
Right arrow Articles by Leavell, N-R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cummings, K M
Right arrow Articles by Leavell, N-R
Tobacco Control 2002;11:i5-i17
© 2002 Tobacco Control


Article

Marketing to America's youth: evidence from corporate documents

K M Cummings1, C P Morley1, J K Horan1, C Steger1, N-R Leavell2

1 Department of Cancer Prevention, Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
2 Summerland Communications, Buffalo, New York, USA

Correspondence to:
K Michael Cummings, PhD, MPH, Department of Cancer Prevention, Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, New York 14263, USA;
Michael.Cummings{at}Roswellpark.org


ABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate the claim that the tobacco industry does not market its products to youth.

Design: The data for this study come from tobacco industry documents collected from the tobacco industry's document websites, presently linked at http://www.tobaccoarchives.com. The websites were searched using "request for production" (RFP) codes, specified keyword searches, and serendipitous terms identified in document citations found with RFP and keyword searches.

Results: Industry documents show that the cigarette manufacturers carefully monitored the smoking habits of teenagers over the past several decades. Candid quotes from industry executives refer to youth as a source of sales and as fundamental to the survival of the tobacco industry. The documents reveal that the features of cigarette brands (that is, use of filters, low tar, bland taste, etc), packaging (that is, size, colour and design), and advertising (that is, media placements and themes and imagery) were developed specifically to appeal to new smokers (that is, teenagers). Evidence also indicates that relevant youth oriented marketing documents may have been destroyed and that the language used in some of the more recent documents may have been sanitised to cover up efforts to market to youth.

Conclusions: The tobacco industry's internal documents reveal an undeniable interest in marketing cigarettes to underage smokers. The industry's marketing approaches run counter to and predicate methods for tobacco prevention: (1) keep the price of the product high; (2) keep product placements and advertising away from schools and other areas with a high volume of youth traffic; (3) make cigarette advertising (that is, themes and visual images) unappealing to youth; (4) make product packaging unappealing to youth; and (5) design the product so it is not easy to inhale.


Keywords: marketing; corporate documents

Abbreviations: FUBYAS, first usual brand young adult smokers; MSA, Master Settlement Agreement; RFP, request for production; YAMS, younger adult male smokers; YAS, young adult smokers




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
S Braun, R Mejia, P M Ling, and E J Perez-Stable
Tobacco industry targeting youth in Argentina
Tob. Control, April 1, 2008; 17(2): 111 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
C. Moodie, A. M. MacKintosh, A. Brown, and G. B. Hastings
Tobacco marketing awareness on youth smoking susceptibility and perceived prevalence before and after an advertising ban
Eur J Public Health, March 24, 2008; (2008) ckn016v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
J. J. Arnett
The Myth of Peer Influence in Adolescent Smoking Initiation
Health Educ Behav, August 1, 2007; 34(4): 594 - 607.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
S J Anderson, T Dewhirst, and P M Ling
Every document and picture tells a story: using internal corporate document reviews, semiotics, and content analysis to assess tobacco advertising
Tob. Control, June 1, 2006; 15(3): 254 - 261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
H de Vries, M Candel, R Engels, and L Mercken
Challenges to the peer influence paradigm: results for 12-13 year olds from six European countries from the European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach study.
Tob. Control, April 1, 2006; 15(2): 83 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
S Chapman
Research from tobacco industry affiliated authors: need for particular vigilance
Tob. Control, August 1, 2005; 14(4): 217 - 219.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
C P Wen, T Chen, Y-Y Tsai, S P Tsai, W S I Chung, T Y Cheng, D T Levy, C C Hsu, R Peterson, and W-Y Liu
Are marketing campaigns in Taiwan by foreign tobacco companies targeting young smokers?
Tob. Control, June 1, 2005; 14(suppl_1): i38 - i44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
L. A. Jason, S. B. Pokorny, K. Mikulski, and M. E. Schoeny
Assessing Storefront Tobacco Advertising after the Billboard Ban
Eval Health Prof, March 1, 2004; 27(1): 22 - 33.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
S M Carter
From legitimate consumers to public relations pawns: the tobacco industry and young Australians
Tob. Control, December 1, 2003; 12(90003): iii71 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
K M Cummings
Smoke-filled rooms: a postmortem on the tobacco deal: By W Kip Viscusi, University of Chicago Press, 2002, $27.50, 263 pp, ISBN 0-226-85747-6
Tob. Control, March 1, 2003; 12(1): 111 - 112.
[Full Text]


Home page
AAP NewsHome page
C. Kemp

AAP News, July 1, 2002; 21(1): 2 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
P. M. Ling and S. A. Glantz
Why and How the Tobacco Industry Sells Cigarettes to Young Adults: Evidence From Industry Documents
Am J Public Health, June 1, 2002; 92(6): 908 - 916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
A. Landman, P. M. Ling, and S. A. Glantz
Tobacco Industry Youth Smoking Prevention Programs: Protecting the Industry and Hurting Tobacco Control
Am J Public Health, June 1, 2002; 92(6): 917 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
K M Cummings and R W Pollay
Exposing Mr Butts' tricks of the trade
Tob. Control, March 1, 2002; 11(90001): i1 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
F J Chaloupka, K M Cummings, C. Morley, and J. Horan
Tax, price and cigarette smoking: evidence from the tobacco documents and implications for tobacco company marketing strategies
Tob. Control, March 1, 2002; 11(90001): i62 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.