| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Article |
1 Department of Cancer Prevention, Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
2 Summerland Communications, Buffalo, New York, USA
Correspondence to:
K Michael Cummings, PhD, MPH, Department of Cancer Prevention, Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, New York 14263, USA;
Michael.Cummings{at}Roswellpark.org
ABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate the claim that the tobacco industry does not market its products to youth.
Design: The data for this study come from tobacco industry documents collected from the tobacco industry's document websites, presently linked at http://www.tobaccoarchives.com. The websites were searched using "request for production" (RFP) codes, specified keyword searches, and serendipitous terms identified in document citations found with RFP and keyword searches.
Results: Industry documents show that the cigarette manufacturers carefully monitored the smoking habits of teenagers over the past several decades. Candid quotes from industry executives refer to youth as a source of sales and as fundamental to the survival of the tobacco industry. The documents reveal that the features of cigarette brands (that is, use of filters, low tar, bland taste, etc), packaging (that is, size, colour and design), and advertising (that is, media placements and themes and imagery) were developed specifically to appeal to new smokers (that is, teenagers). Evidence also indicates that relevant youth oriented marketing documents may have been destroyed and that the language used in some of the more recent documents may have been sanitised to cover up efforts to market to youth.
Conclusions: The tobacco industry's internal documents reveal an undeniable interest in marketing cigarettes to underage smokers. The industry's marketing approaches run counter to and predicate methods for tobacco prevention: (1) keep the price of the product high; (2) keep product placements and advertising away from schools and other areas with a high volume of youth traffic; (3) make cigarette advertising (that is, themes and visual images) unappealing to youth; (4) make product packaging unappealing to youth; and (5) design the product so it is not easy to inhale.
Keywords: marketing; corporate documents
Abbreviations: FUBYAS, first usual brand young adult smokers; MSA, Master Settlement Agreement; RFP, request for production; YAMS, younger adult male smokers; YAS, young adult smokers
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S Braun, R Mejia, P M Ling, and E J Perez-Stable Tobacco industry targeting youth in Argentina Tob. Control, April 1, 2008; 17(2): 111 - 117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Moodie, A. M. MacKintosh, A. Brown, and G. B. Hastings Tobacco marketing awareness on youth smoking susceptibility and perceived prevalence before and after an advertising ban Eur J Public Health, March 24, 2008; (2008) ckn016v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. J. Arnett The Myth of Peer Influence in Adolescent Smoking Initiation Health Educ Behav, August 1, 2007; 34(4): 594 - 607. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S J Anderson, T Dewhirst, and P M Ling Every document and picture tells a story: using internal corporate document reviews, semiotics, and content analysis to assess tobacco advertising Tob. Control, June 1, 2006; 15(3): 254 - 261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H de Vries, M Candel, R Engels, and L Mercken Challenges to the peer influence paradigm: results for 12-13 year olds from six European countries from the European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach study. Tob. Control, April 1, 2006; 15(2): 83 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S Chapman Research from tobacco industry affiliated authors: need for particular vigilance Tob. Control, August 1, 2005; 14(4): 217 - 219. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C P Wen, T Chen, Y-Y Tsai, S P Tsai, W S I Chung, T Y Cheng, D T Levy, C C Hsu, R Peterson, and W-Y Liu Are marketing campaigns in Taiwan by foreign tobacco companies targeting young smokers? Tob. Control, June 1, 2005; 14(suppl_1): i38 - i44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. A. Jason, S. B. Pokorny, K. Mikulski, and M. E. Schoeny Assessing Storefront Tobacco Advertising after the Billboard Ban Eval Health Prof, March 1, 2004; 27(1): 22 - 33. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S M Carter From legitimate consumers to public relations pawns: the tobacco industry and young Australians Tob. Control, December 1, 2003; 12(90003): iii71 - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K M Cummings Smoke-filled rooms: a postmortem on the tobacco deal: By W Kip Viscusi, University of Chicago Press, 2002, $27.50, 263 pp, ISBN 0-226-85747-6 Tob. Control, March 1, 2003; 12(1): 111 - 112. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Kemp AAP News, July 1, 2002; 21(1): 2 - 2. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. M. Ling and S. A. Glantz Why and How the Tobacco Industry Sells Cigarettes to Young Adults: Evidence From Industry Documents Am J Public Health, June 1, 2002; 92(6): 908 - 916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Landman, P. M. Ling, and S. A. Glantz Tobacco Industry Youth Smoking Prevention Programs: Protecting the Industry and Hurting Tobacco Control Am J Public Health, June 1, 2002; 92(6): 917 - 930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K M Cummings and R W Pollay Exposing Mr Butts' tricks of the trade Tob. Control, March 1, 2002; 11(90001): i1 - 4. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F J Chaloupka, K M Cummings, C. Morley, and J. Horan Tax, price and cigarette smoking: evidence from the tobacco documents and implications for tobacco company marketing strategies Tob. Control, March 1, 2002; 11(90001): i62 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
