Article

Tax, price and cigarette smoking: evidence from the tobacco documents and implications for tobacco company marketing strategies

F J Chaloupka¹, K M Cummings², CP Morley² and JK Horan²

¹ Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
² Department of Cancer Prevention, Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
F J Chaloupka, Department of Economics (m/c 144), University of Illinois at Chicago, 601 South Morgan Street, Chicago, IL 60607-7121, USA;
fjc{at}uic.edu

Objective: To examine tobacco company documents to determine what the companies knew about the impact of cigarette prices on smoking among youth, young adults, and adults, and to evaluate how this understanding affected their pricing and price related marketing strategies.

Methods: Data for this study come from tobacco industry documents contained in the Youth and Marketing database created by the Roswell Park Cancer Institute and available through http:// roswell.tobaccodocuments.org, supplemented with documents obtained from http://www.tobaccodocuments.org.

Results: Tobacco company documents provide clear evidence on the impact of cigarette prices on cigarette smoking, describing how tax related and other price increases lead to significant reductions in smoking, particularly among young persons. This information was very important in developing the industry's pricing strategies, including the development of lower price branded generics and the pass through of cigarette excise tax increases, and in developing a variety of price related marketing efforts, including multi-pack discounts, couponing, and others.

Conclusions: Pricing and price related promotions are among the most important marketing tools employed by tobacco companies. Future tobacco control efforts that aim to raise prices and limit price related marketing efforts are likely to be important in achieving reductions in tobacco use and the public health toll caused by tobacco.

Keywords: tax; prices; marketing strategies

Abbreviations: ATC, American Tobacco Company (ATC); B&W, Brown & Williamson; L&M, Liggett & Myers Tobacco Company; NBER, National Bureau of Economic Research; RJR, RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company; YAS, young adult smokers

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• John, R M, Sung, H-Y, Max, W (2009). Economic cost of tobacco use in India, 2004. Tobacco Control 18: 138-143 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Schmitt, C. L, Malarcher, A. M, Clark, P. I, Bombard, J. M, Strauss, W., Stillman, F. A (2007). Community guide recommendations and state level tobacco control programmes: 1999 2004. Tobacco Control 16: 318-324 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Loomis, B. R, Farrelly, M. C, Mann, N. H (2006). The association of retail promotions for cigarettes with the Master Settlement Agreement, tobacco control programmes and cigarette excise taxes. Tobacco Control 15: 458-463 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hyland, A, Laux, F L, Higbee, C, Hastings, G, Ross, H, Chaloupka, F J, Fong, G T, Cummings, K M (2006). Cigarette purchase patterns in four countries and the relationship with cessation: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tobacco Control 15: iii59-iii64 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Loomis, B R, Farrelly, M C, Nonnemaker, J M, Mann, N H (2006). Point of purchase cigarette promotions before and after the Master Settlement Agreement: exploring retail scanner data.. Tobacco Control 15: 140-142 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Feighery, E C, Ribisl, K M, Schleicher, N C, Zellers, L, Wellington, N (2005). How do minimum cigarette price laws affect cigarette prices at the retail level?. Tobacco Control 14: 80-85 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hyland, A, Bauer, J E, Li, Q, Abrams, S M, Higbee, C, Peppone, L, Cummings, K M (2005). Higher cigarette prices influence cigarette purchase patterns. Tobacco Control 14: 86-92 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• McMullen, K M, Brownson, R C, Luke, D, Chriqui, J (2005). Strength of clean indoor air laws and smoking related outcomes in the USA. Tobacco Control 14: 43-48 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Alechnowicz, K, Chapman, S (2004). The Philippine tobacco industry: "the strongest tobacco lobby in Asia". Tobacco Control 13: ii71-ii78 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wilson, N, Thomson, G, Tobias, M, Blakely, T (2004). How much downside? Quantifying the relative harm from tobacco taxation. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 58: 451-454 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lewis, M. J., Delnevo, C. D., Slade, J. (2004). Tobacco Industry Direct Mail Marketing and Participation by New Jersey Adults. Am. J. Public Health 94: 257-259 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Dellavalle, R. P., Schilling, L. M., Chen, A. K., Hester, E. J. (2003). Teenagers in the UV Tanning Booth?: Tax the Tan. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 157: 845-846 [Full Text]  
• Feighery, E C, Ribisl, K M, Clark, P I, Haladjian, H H (2003). How tobacco companies ensure prime placement of their advertising and products in stores: interviews with retailers about tobacco company incentive programmes. Tobacco Control 12: 184-188 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Corso, P. S., Thacker, S. B., Koplan, J. P. (2002). The Value of Prevention: Experiences of a Public Health Agency. Med Decis Making 22: S11-S16  
• Cummings, K M, Pollay, R W (2002). Exposing Mr Butts' tricks of the trade. Tobacco Control 11: i1-4 [Full Text]  
• Cummings, K M, Morley, C P, Horan, J K, Steger, C, Leavell, N-R (2002). Marketing to America's youth: evidence from corporate documents. Tobacco Control 11: i5-17 [Abstract] [Full Text]