RECALL OF ANTI-TOBACCO ADS/IMPACT OF WARNINGS/ADVERTISING

Anti-tobacco advertisements by Massachusetts and Philip Morris: what teenagers think

L Biener

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Lois Biener, PhD, Center for Survey Research, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA 02125, USA;
lois.biener{at}umb.edu

Objective: To assess teenagers' receptivity to anti-tobacco television advertisements produced by public health organisations and by tobacco companies. Reactions were examined as a function of the message type as well as the respondents' demographics and smoking status.

Design: A 1999 telephone survey of teenagers in households identified during a random digit dial survey of adults conducted during the prior four years. Respondents were asked to describe an ad they had seen in the past 30 days, and then to rate its perceived effectiveness.

Participants: Respondents were 733 youth between the ages of 14 and 17 years.

Intervention: The most prominent anti-tobacco advertisements broadcast in Massachusetts during the time covered by the survey consisted of those produced by the Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program and those produced by the Philip Morris tobacco company. The ads described by respondents were grouped into four categories based on their sponsor and their approach.

Main outcome measures: Perceived effectiveness of anti-tobacco advertisements seen during the month before the survey as measured on an 11 point scale.

Results: Ads featuring the serious consequences of smoking were seen as significantly more effective by youth than both Massachusetts ads that did not discuss illness (p < 0.001) and Philip Morris "Think, Don't Smoke" ads (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Youth prevention programmes should not shy away from anti-tobacco ads that feature the serious consequences of smoking. These types of ads are the ones perceived as most effective by teenagers regardless of their smoking status, age, sex or ethnicity.

Keywords: mass media; counter-advertising; smoking prevention; television advertisements; Massachusetts

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Strasser, A. A., Cappella, J. N., Jepson, C., Fishbein, M., Tang, K. Z., Han, E., Lerman, C. (2009). Experimental evaluation of antitobacco PSAs: Effects of message content and format on physiological and behavioral outcomes. Nicotine Tob Res 11: 293-302 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ridout, F., Charlton, A., Hutchison, I. (2008). Health risks information reaches secondary school smokers. Health Educ Res 23: 1039-1048 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mamudu, H. M., Hammond, R., Glantz, S. A. (2008). Project Cerberus: Tobacco Industry Strategy to Create an Alternative to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Am. J. Public Health 98: 1630-1642 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ibrahim, J. K., Glantz, S. A. (2007). The Rise and Fall of Tobacco Control Media Campaigns, 1967 2006. Am. J. Public Health 97: 1383-1396 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wakefield, M., Terry-McElrath, Y., Emery, S., Saffer, H., Chaloupka, F. J., Szczypka, G., Flay, B., O'Malley, P. M., Johnston, L. D. (2006). Effect of Televised, Tobacco Company-Funded Smoking Prevention Advertising on Youth Smoking-Related Beliefs, Intentions, and Behavior. Am. J. Public Health 96: 2154-2160 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wakefield, M., McLeod, K., Perry, C. L (2006). "Stay away from them until you're old enough to make a decision": tobacco company testimony about youth smoking initiation. Tobacco Control 15: iv44-iv53 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pechmann, C., Reibling, E. T. (2006). Antismoking Advertisements for Youths: An Independent Evaluation of Health, Counter-Industry, and Industry Approaches. Am. J. Public Health 96: 906-913 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Henriksen, L, Dauphinee, A L, Wang, Y, Fortmann, S P (2006). Industry sponsored anti-smoking ads and adolescent reactance: test of a boomerang effect. Tobacco Control 15: 13-18 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Carter, S M (2003). From legitimate consumers to public relations pawns: the tobacco industry and young Australians. Tobacco Control 12: iii71-78 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wakefield, M, Freeman, J, Donovan, R (2003). Recall and response of smokers and recent quitters to the Australian National Tobacco Campaign. Tobacco Control 12: ii15-22 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• White, V, Tan, N, Wakefield, M, Hill, D (2003). Do adult focused anti-smoking campaigns have an impact on adolescents? The case of the Australian National Tobacco Campaign. Tobacco Control 12: ii23-29 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wakefield, M, Durrant, R, Terry-McElrath, Y, Ruel, E, Balch, G., Anderson, S, Szczypka, G, Emery, S, Flay, B (2003). Appraisal of anti-smoking advertising by youth at risk for regular smoking: a comparative study in the United States, Australia, and Britain. Tobacco Control 12: ii82-86 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Koh, H K (2002). Accomplishments of the Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program. Tobacco Control 11: ii1-3 [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Life Imitates Art

Sandra C. Jones

Tobacco Control Online, 25 Jul 2002 [Full text]