Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Tobacco Control 2002;11(Supplement 2 ):ii59-ii63; doi:10.1136/tc.11.suppl_2.ii59
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Tobacco Control 2002;11:ii59-ii63
© 2002 Tobacco Control

RECALL OF ANTI-TOBACCO ADS/IMPACT OF WARNINGS/ADVERTISING

Recall of health warnings in smokeless tobacco ads

L Truitt1, W L Hamilton1, P R Johnston1, C P Bacani1, S O Crawford1, L Hozik1, C Celebucki2

1 Abt Associates Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
2 Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Linda Truitt, PhD, Abt Associates Inc, 55 Wheeler Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA;
linda_truitt{at}abtassoc.com

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the effects of health warning characteristics in smokeless tobacco magazine print ads on warning recall, and the implications for current US Federal regulations.

Design: Subjects examined two distracter ads and one of nine randomly assigned smokeless tobacco ads varying in health warning presence, size (8 to 18 point font), and contrast (low versus high)—including no health warning. They were then interviewed about ad content using recall and recognition questions.

Subjects: A convenience sample of 895 English speaking males aged 16–24 years old who were intercepted at seven shopping malls throughout Massachusetts during May 2000.

Main outcome measures: Proven aided recall, or recall of a health warning and correct recognition of the warning message among distracters, and false recall.

Results: Controlling for covariates such as education, employment/student status, and Hispanic background, proven aided recall increased significantly with font size; doubling size from 10 to 20 point font would increase recall from 63% to 76%. Although not statistically significant, recall was somewhat better for high contrast warnings. Ten per cent of the sample mistakenly recalled the warning where none existed.

Conclusions: As demonstrated by substantially greater recall among ads that included health warnings over ads that had none, health warnings retained their value to consumers despite years of exposure (that can produce false recall). Larger health warnings would enhance recall, and the proposed model can be used to estimate potential recall that affects communication, perceived health risk, and behaviour modification.

Keywords: health warnings; advertising; smokeless tobacco


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Koh, H K (2002). Accomplishments of the Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program. Tobacco Control 11: ii1-3 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.