| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
RESEARCH PAPER |
1 Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles, California, USA
2 Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
Correspondence to:
Mark D Weber, 3530 Wilshire Boulevard, 8th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90010, USA;
mweber{at}dhs.co.la.ca.us
Objective: To assess long term compliance with the California Smoke-Free Workplace Law in Los Angeles County freestanding bars and bar/restaurants.
Design: Population based annual site inspection survey of a random sample of Los Angeles County freestanding bars and bar/restaurants was conducted from 1998 to 2002.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcomes of interest were patron and employee smoking. The secondary outcomes of interest were the presence of ashtrays and designated outdoor smoking areas.
Results: Significant increases in patron non-smoking compliance were found for freestanding bars (45.7% to 75.8%, p < 0.0001) and bar/restaurants (92.2% to 98.5%, p < 0.0001) between 1998 and 2002. Increases in employee non-smoking compliance were found for freestanding bars (86.2% to 94.7%, p < 0.0003) and bar/restaurants (96.5% to 99.2%, p < 0.005).
Conclusions: This study provides clear evidence that the California Smoke-Free Workplace Law has been effective at reducing patron and employee smoking in Los Angeles County bars and restaurants. Recommendations include educational campaigns targeted to freestanding bar owners and staff to counter perceptions of lost revenue, more rigorous enforcement, and more severe penalties for repeat violators such as alcohol licence revocation. Policymakers can enact smoke-free restaurant and bar policies to protect employees and patrons from secondhand smoke, confident that these laws can be successfully implemented.
Keywords: clean indoor air laws; secondhand smoke; workplace smoking regulations
Abbreviations: ABC, Alcohol Beverage Control; DHS, Department of Health Services; EHD, Environmental Health Division; SHS, secondhand smoke; TCS, Tobacco Control Section; TCP, Tobacco Control and Prevention Program; TEMC, Tobacco Education Media Campaign; TEP, Tobacco Enforcement Program
Related Article
Tob. Control 2003 12: 247-248.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. Richmond, S. Haw, and J. P. Pell Impact of socioeconomic deprivation and type of facility on perceptions of the Scottish smoke-free legislation J. Public Health Med., December 1, 2007; 29(4): 376 - 378. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Stolzenberg and S. J. D'Alessio Is Nonsmoking Dangerous to the Health of Restaurants? The Effect of California's Indoor Smoking Ban on Restaurant Revenues Eval Rev, February 1, 2007; 31(1): 75 - 92. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Carlsten and W. Burke Potential for Genetics to Promote Public Health: Genetics Research on Smoking Suggests Caution About Expectations JAMA, November 22, 2006; 296(20): 2480 - 2482. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. D. Eisner Banning smoking in public places: time to clear the air. JAMA, October 11, 2006; 296(14): 1778 - 1779. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. S. Jaakkola and J. J. K. Jaakkola Impact of smoke-free workplace legislation on exposures and health: possibilities for prevention. Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2006; 28(2): 397 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G T Fong, A Hyland, R Borland, D Hammond, G Hastings, A McNeill, S Anderson, K M Cummings, S Allwright, M Mulcahy, et al. Reductions in tobacco smoke pollution and increases in support for smoke-free public places following the implementation of comprehensive smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland: findings from the ITC Ireland/UK Survey Tob. Control, June 1, 2006; 15(suppl_3): iii51 - iii58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. K. Glantz and S. A. Glantz Protecting Europeans from secondhand smoke: time to act Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2006; 27(4): 382 - 383. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S Chapman "Half-pregnant" occupational health policy on environmental tobacco smoke Occup. Environ. Med., May 1, 2004; 61(5): 383 - 384. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
