Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, M
Right arrow Articles by Skeer, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, M
Right arrow Articles by Skeer, M
Related Collections
Right arrow Health effects of tobacco use
Right arrow Environmental tobacco smoke
Tobacco Control 2003;12:333-338
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group


REVIEW

Exposure to secondhand smoke and excess lung cancer mortality risk among workers in the "5 B’s": bars, bowling alleys, billiard halls, betting establishments, and bingo parlours

M Siegel, M Skeer

Boston University School of Public Health, Social and Behavioral Sciences Department, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Correspondence to:
Michael Siegel, MD, MPH, Boston University School of Public Health, Social and Behavioral Sciences Department, 715 Albany Street, T2W Boston, MA 02118, USA;
mbsiegel{at}bu.edu


ABSTRACT
Objective: To review existing data on exposure to secondhand smoke in bars, bowling alleys, billiard halls, betting establishments, and bingo parlours (the "5 B’s") as assessed by ambient nicotine air concentration measurements and to estimate the excess lung cancer mortality risk associated with this exposure.

Data sources: Using the Medline, Toxline, and Toxnet databases, the internet, and bibliographies of relevant articles, we identified studies that reported measurements of ambient nicotine concentrations in the 5 B’s.

Study selection: Studies were included if they reported a mean concentration of ambient nicotine measured in at least one of the 5 B’s.

Data extraction: We calculated a weighted average of nicotine concentrations in each of the 5 B’s. We then estimated the working lifetime excess lung cancer mortality risk associated with this exposure, as well as with exposure at the upper and lower limits of the range of mean exposures reported in all of the studies in each establishment category.

Data synthesis: Nicotine concentrations in the 5 B’s were 2.4 to 18.5 times higher than in offices or residences, and 1.5 to 11.7 times higher than in restaurants. At these exposure levels, estimated working lifetime excess lung cancer mortality risk from secondhand smoke exposure for workers in the 5 B’s is between 1.0–4.1/1000, which greatly exceeds the typical de manifestis risk level of 0.3/1000.

Conclusions: Workers in the 5 B’s have high levels of occupational exposure to secondhand smoke and must be included in workplace smoking regulations.


Keywords: secondhand smoke; health policy




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
M. J. Stark, K. Rohde, J. E. Maher, B. A. Pizacani, C. W. Dent, R. Bard, S. G. Carmella, A. R. Benoit, N. M. Thomson, and S. S. Hecht
The Impact of Clean Indoor Air Exemptions and Preemption Policies on the Prevalence of a Tobacco-Specific Lung Carcinogen Among Nonsmoking Bar and Restaurant Workers
Am J Public Health, August 1, 2007; 97(8): 1457 - 1463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
S. Semple, K. S Creely, A. Naji, B. G Miller, and J. G Ayres
Secondhand smoke levels in Scottish pubs: the effect of smoke-free legislation
Tob. Control, April 1, 2007; 16(2): 127 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. D. Eisner
Banning smoking in public places: time to clear the air.
JAMA, October 11, 2006; 296(14): 1778 - 1779.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
D. Rosenfield, D. G. Manuel, and D. A. Alter
The Smoking Regulatory Index: a new way to measure public health performance.
Can. Med. Assoc. J., May 9, 2006; 174(10): 1403 - 1404.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
I. L. Gee, A. F. R. Watson, J. Carrington, P. R. Edwards, M. van Tongeren, P. McElduff, and R. E. Edwards
Second-hand smoke levels in UK pubs and bars: do the English Public Health White Paper proposals go far enough?
J. Public Health Med., March 1, 2006; 28(1): 17 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
M Mulcahy, D S Evans, S K Hammond, J L Repace, and M Byrne
Secondhand smoke exposure and risk following the Irish smoking ban: an assessment of salivary cotinine concentrations in hotel workers and air nicotine levels in bars
Tob. Control, December 1, 2005; 14(6): 384 - 388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
Environmental tobacco smoke still threatening workers in bars, betting establishments, billiard halls, bowling alleys and bingo halls
Occup. Environ. Med., January 1, 2004; 61(1): 85 - 85.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.