RESEARCH PAPER

The US tobacco control community’s view of the future of tobacco harm reduction

K E Warner, E G Martin

Department of Health Management & Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Kenneth E Warner
Department of Health Management & Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 109 South Observatory Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2029, USA; kwarner{at}umich.edu

Objective: Tobacco harm reduction (THR) has garnered recent attention due to the introduction of novel nicotine delivery products ostensibly intended to reduce risk for inveterate cigarette smokers. This study evaluates the grassroots tobacco control community’s knowledge, opinions, and beliefs about THR.

Design: A web/mail survey conducted in October and November 2002, with a telephone survey of a sample of non-respondents.

Subjects: The 2833 US based registrants for the 2001 National Conference on Tobacco or Health.

Main outcome measures: Respondents’ awareness of THR, perception of its importance, support for regulation, and perception of which THR products should be recommended to inveterate cigarette smokers.

Results: 70% of respondents were aware of THR but respondents had low recognition of specific products at the forefront of the debate, such as Swedish snuff. Half believe THR will reduce smoking cessation and cause nicotine experimentation by children; 63% anticipate unintended adverse side effects. More expect THR to have a negative than a positive impact on health. Large majorities support government regulation of THR and conventional tobacco products, but fewer than 30% expect legislation regulating either. Most would recommend nicotine patches (76%) and gum (70%) to inveterate smokers, but no other product was supported by a majority. Scientists are more supportive of THR than activists, while respondents focusing on national/international issues are more supportive than those concentrating on local/state issues.

Conclusions: Many members of the US tobacco control community are unaware of the THR "movement", while others possess only rudimentary familiarity with it. If and as THR achieves an increasingly prominent role on the tobacco-or-health scene, this community will have to become educated about THR, and be prepared to advocate for regulatory policies that will maximise the potential for positive outcomes. The potential for negative outcomes remains significant.

Keywords: tobacco; harm reduction; survey

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Parascandola, M., Augustson, E., O'Connell, M. E., Marcus, S. (2009). Consumer awareness and attitudes related to new potential reduced-exposure tobacco product brands. Nicotine Tob Res 11: 886-895 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Chen, A., Glantz, S., Tong, E. (2007). Asian herbal-tobacco cigarettes: "not medicine but less harmful"?. Tobacco Control 16: e3-e3 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Caraballo, R S, Pederson, L L, Gupta, N (2006). New tobacco products: do smokers like them?. Tobacco Control 15: 39-44 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stanwick, R (2005). Canada gets its house in order. Inj. Prev. 11: 259-260 [Full Text]  
• Kozlowski, L T, Edwards, B Q (2005). "Not safe" is not enough: smokers have a right to know more than there is no safe tobacco product. Tobacco Control 14: ii3-ii7 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Walsh, M. M., Ellison, J. A. (2005). Treatment of Tobacco Use and Dependence: The Role of the Dental Professional. J Dent Educ 69: 521-537 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Giovino, G. A. (2004). TOBACCO HARM REDUCTION INVOLVES MORE THAN CIGARETTE HARM REDUCTION. AJPH 94: 1294-1294 [Full Text]  
• Martin, E G, Warner, K E, Lantz, P M (2004). Tobacco harm reduction: what do the experts think?. Tobacco Control 13: 123-128 [Abstract] [Full Text]