RESEARCH PAPER

Impact of the graphic Canadian warning labels on adult smoking behaviour

D Hammond¹, G T Fong^3,, P W McDonald^2,*, R Cameron^2,, K S Brown^3,

¹ Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
² Department of Health Studies, University of Waterloo
³ Ontario Tobacco Research Unit, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
David Hammond
MSc, Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario N21 3G1, Canada; dhammond{at}uwaterloo.ca

Objective: To assess the impact of graphic Canadian cigarette warning labels on current adult smokers.

Design: A random-digit-dial telephone survey was conducted with 616 adult smokers in south western Ontario, Canada in October/November 2001, with three month follow up.

Main outcome measures: Smoking behaviour (quitting, quit attempts, and reduced smoking), intentions to quit, and salience of the warning labels.

Results: Virtually all smokers (91%) reported having read the warning labels and smokers demonstrated a thorough knowledge of their content. A strong positive relation was observed between a measure of cognitive processing—the extent to which smokers reported reading, thinking about, and discussing the new labels—and smokers’ intentions to quit (odds ratio (OR) 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 to 1.16; p < 0.001). Most important, cognitive processing predicted cessation behaviour at follow up. Smokers who had read, thought about, and discussed the new labels at baseline were more likely to have quit, made a quit attempt, or reduced their smoking three months later, after adjusting for intentions to quit and smoking status at baseline (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.12; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Graphic cigarette warning labels serve as an effective population based smoking cessation intervention. The findings add to the growing literature on health warnings and provide strong support for the effectiveness of Canada’s tobacco labelling policy.

Keywords: policy; cessation; warning labels

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Borland, R, Wilson, N, Fong, G T, Hammond, D, Cummings, K M, Yong, H-H, Hosking, W, Hastings, G, Thrasher, J, McNeill, A (2009). Impact of graphic and text warnings on cigarette packs: findings from four countries over five years. Tobacco Control 18: 358-364 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Vardavas, C. I., Connolly, G., Karamanolis, K., Kafatos, A. (2009). Adolescents perceived effectiveness of the proposed European graphic tobacco warning labels. Eur J Public Health 19: 212-217 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fathelrahman, A. I., Omar, M., Awang, R., Borland, R., Fong, G. T., Hammond, D., Zain, Z. (2009). Smokers' responses toward cigarette pack warning labels in predicting quit intention, stage of change, and self-efficacy. Nicotine Tob Res 11: 248-253 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Strasser, A A, Tang, K Z, Tuller, M D, Cappella, J N (2008). PREP advertisement features affect smokers' beliefs regarding potential harm. Tobacco Control 17: i32-i38 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Vardavas, C. I., Kafatos, A. G. (2007). Smoking policy and prevalence in Greece: an overview. Eur J Public Health 17: 211-213 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Linnebur, S. A. (2006). Tobacco education: Emphasizing impotence as a consequence of smoking. Am J Health Syst Pharm 63: 2509-2512 [Full Text]  
• West, R. (2006). Tobacco control: present and future. Br Med Bull 0: ldl012v1-14 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wander, N., Malone, R. E (2006). Making Big Tobacco Give In: You Lose, They Win. AJPH 96: 2048-2054 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fong, G T, Cummings, K M, Borland, R, Hastings, G, Hyland, A, Giovino, G A, Hammond, D, Thompson, M E (2006). The conceptual framework of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Policy Evaluation Project. Tobacco Control 15: iii3-iii11 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hammond, D, Fong, G T, McNeill, A, Borland, R, Cummings, K M (2006). Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tobacco Control 15: iii19-iii25 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hammond, D., Fong, G. T., Mcdonald, P. W., Brown, K. S., Cameron, R. (2006). Showing leads to doing: graphic cigarette warning labels are an effective public health policy.. Eur J Public Health 16: 223-224 [Full Text]  
• Sebrie, E., Glantz, S. A (2006). The tobacco industry in developing countries. BMJ 332: 313-314 [Full Text]  
• Hanioka, T., Tanaka, K., Ojima, M., Yuuki, K. (2005). Association of Melanin Pigmentation in the Gingiva of Children With Parents Who Smoke. Pediatrics 116: e186-e190 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Henriksen, L, Feighery, E C, Schleicher, N C, Haladjian, H H, Fortmann, S P (2004). Reaching youth at the point of sale: cigarette marketing is more prevalent in stores where adolescents shop frequently. Tobacco Control 13: 315-318 [Abstract] [Full Text]