REVIEW

Application of toxicological risk assessment principles to the chemical constituents of cigarette smoke

J Fowles¹, E Dybing²

¹ Institute of Environmental Science and Research, Ltd, Porirua, New Zealand
² Division of Environmental Medicine, Norwegian Institute of Public Health. Oslo, Norway

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Jeff R Fowles
Institute of Environmental Science and Research, Ltd, PO Box 50-348, Porirua, New Zealand; jeff.fowles{at}esr.cri.nz

Objective: To provide a hazard prioritisation for reported chemical constituents of cigarette smoke using toxicological risk assessment principles and assumptions. The purpose is to inform prevention efforts using harm reduction.

Data sources: International Agency for Research on Cancer Monographs; California and US Environmental Protection Agency cancer potency factors (CPFs) and reference exposure levels; scientific journals and government reports from the USA, Canada, and New Zealand.

Study selection: This was an inclusive review of studies reporting yields of cigarette smoke constituents using standard ISO methods.

Data extraction: Where possible, the midpoint of reported ranges of yields was used.

Data synthesis: Data on 158 compounds in cigarette smoke were found. Of these, 45 were known or suspected human carcinogens. Cancer potency factors were available for 40 of these compounds and reference exposure levels (RELs) for non-cancer effects were found for 17. A cancer risk index (CRI) was calculated by multiplying yield levels with CPFs. A non-cancer risk index (NCRI) was calculated by dividing yield levels with RELs. Gas phase constituents dominate both CRI and NCRI for cigarette smoke. The contribution of 1,3-butadiene (BDE) to CRI was more than twice that of the next highest contributing carcinogen (acrylonitrile) using potencies from the State of California EPA. Using those potencies from the USEPA, BDE ranked third behind arsenic and acetaldehyde. A comparison of CRI estimates with estimates of smoking related cancer deaths in the USA showed that the CRI underestimates the observed cancer rates by about fivefold using ISO yields in the exposure estimate.

Conclusions: The application of toxicological risk assessment methods to cigarette smoke provides a plausible and objective framework for the prioritisation of carcinogens and other toxicant hazards in cigarette smoke. However, this framework does not enable the prediction of actual cancer risk for a number of reasons that are discussed. Further, the lack of toxicology data on cardiovascular end points for specific chemicals makes the use of this framework less useful for cardiovascular toxicity. The bases for these priorities need to be constantly re-evaluated as new toxicology information emerges.

Keywords: coumarin; ingredients; regulation

Abbreviations: BDE, 1,3-butadiene; Cal/EPA, California Environmental Protection Agency; CRI, cancer risk indices; CPF, cancer potency factor; IARC, International Agency for Research on Cancer; ISO, International Organization for Standardization; NAB, N-nitrosoanabasine, NAT, N-nitrosoanatabine; NCRI, non-cancer risk index; REL, reference exposure level; USEPA, US Environmental Protection Agency; TCDD, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Shi, F.-D., Piao, W.-H., Kuo, Y.-P., Campagnolo, D. I., Vollmer, T. L., Lukas, R. J. (2009). Nicotinic Attenuation of Central Nervous System Inflammation and Autoimmunity. J. Immunol. 182: 1730-1739 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Chapman, S. (2008). Should smoking in outside public spaces be banned? No. BMJ 337: a2804-a2804 [Full Text]  
• Leonardi-Bee, J, Smyth, A, Britton, J, Coleman, T (2008). Environmental tobacco smoke and fetal health: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 93: F351-F361 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Polzin, G M, Zhang, L, Hearn, B A, Tavakoli, A D, Vaughan, C, Ding, Y S, Ashley, D L, Watson, C H (2008). Effect of charcoal-containing cigarette filters on gas phase volatile organic compounds in mainstream cigarette smoke. Tobacco Control 17: i10-i16 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Burns, D M, Dybing, E, Gray, N, Hecht, S, Anderson, C, Sanner, T, O'Connor, R, Djordjevic, M, Dresler, C, Hainaut, P, Jarvis, M, Opperhuizen, A, Straif, K (2008). Mandated lowering of toxicants in cigarette smoke: a description of the World Health Organization TobReg proposal. Tobacco Control 17: 132-141 [Full Text]  
• Swan, G. E., Lessov-Schlaggar, C. N. (2008). The Genetics of Nicotine Addiction: Current Status and Future Directions. Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed Book 2008: 70-73 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rabinoff, M., Caskey, N., Rissling, A., Park, C. (2007). Pharmacological and Chemical Effects of Cigarette Additives. AJPH 97: 1981-1991 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Haussmann, H.-J. (2007). Smoking and Lung Cancer: Future Research Directions. International Journal of Toxicology 26: 353-364 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stephens, W E (2007). Dependence of tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide yields on physical parameters: implications for exposure, emissions control and monitoring. Tobacco Control 16: 170-176 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pankow, J. F., Watanabe, K. H., Toccalino, P. L., Luo, W., Austin, D. F. (2007). Calculated Cancer Risks for Conventional and "Potentially Reduced Exposure Product" Cigarettes. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 16: 584-592 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Laugesen, M., Fowles, J. (2006). Marlboro UltraSmooth: a potentially reduced exposure cigarette?. Tobacco Control 15: 430-435 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Siahpush, M, McNeill, A, Hammond, D, Fong, G T (2006). Socioeconomic and country variations in knowledge of health risks of tobacco smoking and toxic constituents of smoke: results from the 2002 International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tobacco Control 15: iii65-iii70 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Schick, S, Glantz, S (2005). Philip Morris toxicological experiments with fresh sidestream smoke: more toxic than mainstream smoke. Tobacco Control 14: 396-404 [Abstract] [Full Text]