Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Durrant, R
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Durrant, R
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, S
Related Collections
Right arrow Smoking
Right arrow Smoking cessation
Right arrow Economics of tobacco use and control
Right arrow Communication
Right arrow Prevention and health promotion
Tobacco Control 2003;12:ii75
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group

Tobacco in the news: an analysis of newspaper coverage of tobacco issues in Australia, 2001

R Durrant1, M Wakefield1, K McLeod1, K Clegg-Smith2, S Chapman3

1 Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, The Cancer Council Victoria, Australia
2 Health Research and Policy Centers, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA
3 School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Australia

Correspondence to:
M Wakefield, Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, The Cancer Council Victoria, 1 Rathdowne Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia;
melanie.wakefield{at}cancervic.org.au

Objective: To assess the extent and nature of newspaper coverage of tobacco related issues in Australia in 2001.

Design: Content analysis of newspaper articles.

Subjects: All articles (n=1188) at least seven lines long and containing at least one paragraph focused on tobacco in all major Australian national and State capital city newspapers (n=12) in 2001.

Main outcome measures: Number of articles, month of publication, State in which newspaper published, prominence of article, type of article, article theme, and slant of article relative to tobacco control objectives.

Results: The number of tobacco articles varied considerably in different months over the course of the year, from a low of 51 in December to a peak of 180 in May. The most frequent theme was secondhand smoke issues (30% of articles), with the second most dominant theme related to education, prevention, and cessation programmes and services (20%). Events that were covered were predominantly positive for tobacco control: 62% of articles were related to events that were positive, compared with 21% that were negative for tobacco control objectives. Excluding news articles, the opinions expressed by the authors of articles were also mainly positive (61%) rather than negative (22%) for tobacco control objectives. The amount of coverage of and population exposure to tobacco focused articles showed considerable variation across different Australian States, with Victoria having the highest frequency and rate of articles and the most media impressions per capita throughout 2001.

Conclusions: Coverage of events and opinions related to tobacco in Australian newspapers in 2001 was generally positive for tobacco control objectives. Given that over 2 million individuals (out of a population of 19 million) were potentially exposed to tobacco related newspaper articles per day in Australia, this represents good news for tobacco control advocates. The variation in news coverage in different States and at different times in the year, however, illustrates how a combination of local events and advocacy efforts may at times combine to make tobacco more newsworthy. Understanding which tobacco issues are most likely to be covered and the nature of the coverage about them provides valuable feedback for tobacco control advocates and is a useful gauge of actual events as well as the tobacco related agendas promoted by the press.


Keywords: Australia; newspapers; media impressions; coding procedures

Abbreviations: MAV, media advocacy variable




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
M. Long, M. D Slater, and L. Lysengen
US news media coverage of tobacco control issues.
Tob. Control, October 1, 2006; 15(5): 367 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
S Chapman
Erectile dysfunction and smoking: subverting tobacco industry images of masculine potency.
Tob. Control, April 1, 2006; 15(2): 73 - 74.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
K. C. Smith, K. McLeod, and M. Wakefield
Australian Letters to the Editor on Tobacco: Triggers, Rhetoric, and Claims of Legitimate Voice
Qual Health Res, November 1, 2005; 15(9): 1180 - 1198.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.