RESEARCH PAPER

The Australian cigarette brand as product, person, and symbol

S M Carter

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Stacy M Carter
School of Public Health, Room 128A Building A27, University of Sydney NSW 2006, Australia; carters{at}health.usyd.edu.au

Objective: To examine, for dominant Australian cigarette brands, brand identity (overriding brand vision), brand positioning (brand identity elements communicated to the consumer), brand image (consumers’ brand perceptions) and brand equity (financial value).

Design: Tobacco industry documents, articles from retail trade publications since 1990, and current brand advertising from retail trade publications were searched for information about Australian brands.

Results: Cigarette manufacturers benefit from their competitors’ brand equity as well as their own. The industry sees Australian smokers as far less brand loyal and strongly oriented to "low tar". A few predominantly local brands dominate the market, with variation by state. Successful Australian brands exist in one of three categories: premium, mainstream, and supervalue. Their brand identity essence is as follows. Premium: quality. Mainstream: a good humoured "fair go" for ordinary Australians. Supervalue: value for money. All supervalue brand identities also include freedom, escape, mildness, an aspirational attitude, blue tones, and waterside scenes. Brand image and brand identity is frequently congruent, even when marketing is restricted, and brand image is generally more positive for a smoker’s own brand.

Conclusions: Tobacco control activities have undermined cigarette brand equity. Further research is needed regarding brand loyalty, low tar, and brand categories. Smokers may respond more positively to tobacco control messages consistent with the identities of their chosen brand, and brand-as-organisation elements may assist. Further marketing restrictions should consider all elements of brand identity, and aim to undermine brand categories.

Keywords: Keywords: tobacco industry; Australia; brand; marketing

Abbreviations: BATA, British American Tobacco Australia Limited; PMI, Philip Morris International; PML, Philip Morris (Australia) Limited; TAP Act, Tobacco Advertising Prohibition Act; TPM, total particulate matter

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Miller, C. L., Hill, D. J., Quester, P. G., Hiller, J. E. (2009). Response of mass media, tobacco industry and smokers to the introduction of graphic cigarette pack warnings in Australia. Eur J Public Health 19: 644-649 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Anderson, S. J, Ling, P. M, Glantz, S. A (2007). Implications of the federal court order banning the terms "light" and "mild": what difference could it make?. Tobacco Control 16: 275-279 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Anderson, S J, Dewhirst, T, Ling, P M (2006). Every document and picture tells a story: using internal corporate document reviews, semiotics, and content analysis to assess tobacco advertising. Tobacco Control 15: 254-261 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hafez, N, Ling, P M (2005). How Philip Morris built Marlboro into a global brand for young adults: implications for international tobacco control. Tobacco Control 14: 262-271 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bansal, R, John, S, Ling, P M (2005). Cigarette advertising in Mumbai, India: targeting different socioeconomic groups, women, and youth. Tobacco Control 14: 201-206 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Carter, S M (2003). From legitimate consumers to public relations pawns: the tobacco industry and young Australians. Tobacco Control 12: iii71-78 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Carter, S M (2003). Going below the line: creating transportable brands for Australia's dark market. Tobacco Control 12: iii87-94 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Carter, S M (2003). New frontier, new power: the retail environment in Australia's dark market. Tobacco Control 12: iii95-101 [Abstract] [Full Text]