RESEARCH PAPER

Changes in population attitudes about where smoking should not be allowed: California versus the rest of the USA

E A Gilpin, L Lee, J P Pierce

Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
John P Pierce
PhD, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, 0645, La Jolla, CA 92093-0645, USA; jppierce{at}ucsd.edu

Background: The decade long California Tobacco Control Program is unique to the nation in its duration, emphasis, and level of funding. Programme emphasis is on changing social norms about smoking as a means to discourage smoking and thus reduce the harmful health effects of tobacco to the population.

Methods: Data from the 1992–93, 1995–96, and 1998–99 Tobacco Use Supplements to the national Current Population Survey (n > 175 000 each period) were used to examine changes in norms regarding where smoking should "not be allowed at all" in both California and in the rest of the USA. Venues queried were restaurants, hospitals, work areas, bars, indoor sports venues, and indoor shopping malls.

Results: There were substantial increases in the percentages of the adult population (18+ years) stating that smoking should not be allowed in the venues queried in California by 1998–99 compared to 1992–93; only modest increases were observed in the rest of the USA. In fact, for most venues, the percentages for the rest of the USA were lower in 1998–99 than in California in 1992–93. Further, the percentage increase over this period in respondents stating that smoking should not be allowed in four or more of the six venues was 30% in California and 23% in the rest of the USA. The most dramatic percentage increase in California occurred among current smokers (93%).

Conclusions: A strong, comprehensive tobacco control programme such as California’s can influence population norms, including those of smokers, with respect to where smoking should not be allowed.

Abbreviations: CPS, Current Population Survey; TUS, Tobacco Use Supplement

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Brown, A., Moodie, C., Hastings, G. (2009). A longitudinal study of policy effect (smoke-free legislation) on smoking norms: ITC Scotland/United Kingdom. Nicotine Tob Res 11: 924-932 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kleinman, A., Hall-Clifford, R. (2009). Stigma: a social, cultural and moral process. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 63: 418-419 [Full Text]  
• Hamilton, W. L., Biener, L., Brennan, R. T. (2008). Do local tobacco regulations influence perceived smoking norms? Evidence from adult and youth surveys in Massachusetts. Health Educ Res 23: 709-722 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Messer, K., Trinidad, D. R., Al-Delaimy, W. K., Pierce, J. P. (2008). Smoking Cessation Rates in the United States: A Comparison of Young Adult and Older Smokers. AJPH 98: 317-322 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Marlow, M. L. (2007). Do Tobacco-Control Programs Lower Tobacco Consumption?: Evidence from California. Public Finance Review 35: 689-709 [Abstract]  
• Messer, K., Pierce, J. P, Zhu, S.-H., Hartman, A. M, Al-Delaimy, W. K, Trinidad, D. R, Gilpin, E. A (2007). The California Tobacco Control Program's effect on adult smokers: (1) Smoking cessation. Tobacco Control 16: 85-90 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Trinidad, D. R, Messer, K., Gilpin, E. A, Al-Delaimy, W. K, White, M. M, Pierce, J. P (2007). The California Tobacco Control Program's effect on adult smokers: (3) Similar effects for African Americans across states. Tobacco Control 16: 96-100 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Moore, R. S, Lee, J. P, Antin, T. M J, Martin, S. E (2006). Tobacco free workplace policies and low socioeconomic status female bartenders in San Francisco. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 60: ii51-ii56 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Alamar, B., Glantz, S. A. (2006). Effect of Increased Social Unacceptability of Cigarette Smoking on Reduction in Cigarette Consumption. AJPH 96: 1359-1363 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fong, G T, Hyland, A, Borland, R, Hammond, D, Hastings, G, McNeill, A, Anderson, S, Cummings, K M, Allwright, S, Mulcahy, M, Howell, F, Clancy, L, Thompson, M E, Connolly, G, Driezen, P (2006). Reductions in tobacco smoke pollution and increases in support for smoke-free public places following the implementation of comprehensive smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland: findings from the ITC Ireland/UK Survey. Tobacco Control 15: iii51-iii58 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bayer, R., Stuber, J. (2006). Tobacco Control, Stigma, and Public Health: Rethinking the Relations. AJPH 96: 47-50 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gilpin, E A, Lee, L, Pierce, J P, Tang, H, Lloyd, J (2004). Support for protection from secondhand smoke: California 2002. Tobacco Control 13: 96-96 [Full Text]