HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gilpin, E A Articles by Pierce, J P Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gilpin, E A Articles by Pierce, J P

Changes in population attitudes about where smoking should not be allowed: California versus the rest of the USA

Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA

Correspondence to:
John P Pierce
PhD, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, 0645, La Jolla, CA 92093-0645, USA; jppierce{at}ucsd.edu

Background: The decade long California Tobacco Control Program is unique to the nation in its duration, emphasis, and level of funding. Programme emphasis is on changing social norms about smoking as a means to discourage smoking and thus reduce the harmful health effects of tobacco to the population.

Methods: Data from the 1992–93, 1995–96, and 1998–99 Tobacco Use Supplements to the national Current Population Survey (n > 175 000 each period) were used to examine changes in norms regarding where smoking should "not be allowed at all" in both California and in the rest of the USA. Venues queried were restaurants, hospitals, work areas, bars, indoor sports venues, and indoor shopping malls.

Results: There were substantial increases in the percentages of the adult population (18+ years) stating that smoking should not be allowed in the venues queried in California by 1998–99 compared to 1992–93; only modest increases were observed in the rest of the USA. In fact, for most venues, the percentages for the rest of the USA were lower in 1998–99 than in California in 1992–93. Further, the percentage increase over this period in respondents stating that smoking should not be allowed in four or more of the six venues was 30% in California and 23% in the rest of the USA. The most dramatic percentage increase in California occurred among current smokers (93%).

Conclusions: A strong, comprehensive tobacco control programme such as California’s can influence population norms, including those of smokers, with respect to where smoking should not be allowed.

Abbreviations: CPS, Current Population Survey; TUS, Tobacco Use Supplement

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. L. Hamilton, L. Biener, and R. T. Brennan Do local tobacco regulations influence perceived smoking norms? Evidence from adult and youth surveys in Massachusetts Health Educ. Res., August 1, 2008; 23(4): 709 - 722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Messer, D. R. Trinidad, W. K. Al-Delaimy, and J. P. Pierce Smoking Cessation Rates in the United States: A Comparison of Young Adult and Older Smokers Am J Public Health, February 1, 2008; 98(2): 317 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Marlow Do Tobacco-Control Programs Lower Tobacco Consumption?: Evidence from California Public Finance Review, November 1, 2007; 35(6): 689 - 709. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Messer, J. P Pierce, S.-H. Zhu, A. M Hartman, W. K Al-Delaimy, D. R Trinidad, and E. A Gilpin The California Tobacco Control Program's effect on adult smokers: (1) Smoking cessation Tob. Control, April 1, 2007; 16(2): 85 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. R Trinidad, K. Messer, E. A Gilpin, W. K Al-Delaimy, M. M White, and J. P Pierce The California Tobacco Control Program's effect on adult smokers: (3) Similar effects for African Americans across states Tob. Control, April 1, 2007; 16(2): 96 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S Moore, J. P Lee, T. M J Antin, and S. E Martin Tobacco free workplace policies and low socioeconomic status female bartenders in San Francisco J. Epidemiol. Community Health, September 1, 2006; 60(suppl_2): ii51 - ii56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Alamar and S. A. Glantz Effect of Increased Social Unacceptability of Cigarette Smoking on Reduction in Cigarette Consumption Am J Public Health, August 1, 2006; 96(8): 1359 - 1363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G T Fong, A Hyland, R Borland, D Hammond, G Hastings, A McNeill, S Anderson, K M Cummings, S Allwright, M Mulcahy, et al. Reductions in tobacco smoke pollution and increases in support for smoke-free public places following the implementation of comprehensive smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland: findings from the ITC Ireland/UK Survey Tob. Control, June 1, 2006; 15(suppl_3): iii51 - iii58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Bayer and J. Stuber Tobacco Control, Stigma, and Public Health: Rethinking the Relations Am J Public Health, January 1, 2006; 96(1): 47 - 50. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E A Gilpin, L Lee, J P Pierce, H Tang, and J Lloyd Support for protection from secondhand smoke: California 2002 Tob. Control, March 1, 2004; 13(1): 96 - 96. [Full Text] [PDF]