Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shiffman, S
Right arrow Articles by Di Marino, M E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shiffman, S
Right arrow Articles by Di Marino, M E
Tobacco Control 2004;13:78-84
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


RESEARCH PAPER

Smoker and ex-smoker reactions to cigarettes claiming reduced risk

S Shiffman1, J L Pillitteri2, S L Burton3, M E Di Marino4

1 Pinney Associates and University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
2 Pinney Associates, Seattle, Washington, USA
3 GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
4 Pinney Associates, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Correspondence to:
Saul Shiffman PhD
Pinney Associates, 201 North Craig Street, Suite 320, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; shiffman{at}pinneyassociates.com

Context: The tobacco industry is introducing modified tobacco products claiming to reduce the risk of smoking (potential reduced exposure products, PREPs). If PREPs are perceived as safe, they may deter smokers from quitting and encourage re-initiation by smokers who have quit.

Objective: To assess smokers’ and ex-smokers’ perceptions of PREPs and the impact of PREP claims on interest in quitting (among smokers) or in resuming smoking (ex-smokers).

Design: A random-digit-dialled survey of US smokers and ex-smokers. We used Eclipse, a modified PREP cigarette, as an exemplar PREP. During the survey, the interviewer read risk reduction claims made for Eclipse by its manufacturer, assessing smokers’ interest in quitting before and after the exposure.

Participants: 1000 current cigarette smokers and 499 ex-smokers (300 quit within the last two years), over 18 years old.

Main outcome measures: Perception of risk reduction from Eclipse; interest in using Eclipse; smokers’ interest in quitting was assessed using a stage of change approach (pre- and post-exposure to claims).

Results: 91% of smokers thought Eclipse was safer than regular cigarettes. 24% believed Eclipse was completely safe. 57.4% of smokers were interested in using Eclipse; interest was greatest among smokers who were contemplating quitting. Exposure to Eclipse’s claims was followed by reduced interest in quitting. Among all ex-smokers, interest in Eclipse was 6.2%, but interest was 15.2% among young adults (18–25 years) who had stopped smoking within two years.

Conclusions: There is substantial risk that smokers will overinterpret reduced risk claims made for modified tobacco products. PREPs appeal to smokers who are contemplating quitting and exposure to reduced risk product claims appears to reduce smokers’ readiness to quit. PREPs also appealed to young adults who had recently stopped smoking. Thus, reduced risk tobacco product claims can undermine adult cessation and youth prevention, possibly resulting in increased harm even if the products are less toxic.


Keywords: modified tobacco products; reduced risk; smokers’ reactions




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
L. Biener, K. Bogen, and G. Connolly
Impact of corrective health information on consumers' perceptions of "reduced exposure" tobacco products
Tob. Control, October 1, 2007; 16(5): 306 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. F. Pankow, K. H. Watanabe, P. L. Toccalino, W. Luo, and D. F. Austin
Calculated Cancer Risks for Conventional and "Potentially Reduced Exposure Product" Cigarettes
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2007; 16(3): 584 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
G. F. Wayne
Potential reduced exposure products (PREPs) in industry trial testimony
Tob. Control, December 1, 2006; 15(suppl_4): iv90 - iv97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
H. A. Tindle, N. A. Rigotti, R. B. Davis, E. M. Barbeau, I. Kawachi, and S. Shiffman
Cessation Among Smokers of "Light" Cigarettes: Results From the 2000 National Health Interview Survey
Am J Public Health, August 1, 2006; 96(8): 1498 - 1504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
T Eissenberg
The time for tobacco industry sponsored PREP evaluation has arrived
Tob. Control, February 1, 2006; 15(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
R S Caraballo, L L Pederson, and N Gupta
New tobacco products: do smokers like them?
Tob. Control, February 1, 2006; 15(1): 39 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.