HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ogilvie, D Articles by Petticrew, M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ogilvie, D Articles by Petticrew, M

Reducing social inequalities in smoking: can evidence inform policy? A pilot study

MRC Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr David Ogilvie
MRC Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, 4 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow G12 8RZ, UK; david-o{at}msoc.mrc.gla.ac.uk

ABSTRACT
Objective: To assess the potential contribution of evidence from existing systematic reviews of effectiveness to answering the question: what works in reducing social inequalities in smoking?

Data source: The Cochrane Library (2002/4).

Study selection: Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of community based tobacco control interventions, and all the primary studies included in one of these reviews.

Data extraction: Reviews and primary studies were assessed for intent to assess the social distribution of intervention effects, information about the social inclusiveness or targeting of interventions, baseline sociodemographic data collected on participants, and estimates of effect size stratified by sociodemographic variables.

Data synthesis: Only one review aimed to examine outcomes stratified by sex, age or socioeconomic status, and these aims were only achieved with respect to sex. Sociodemographic data about participants were frequently collected in primary studies, but not used to compare intervention effects between social groups.

Conclusions: There may be scope for using existing research more effectively to contribute to evidence based policy to reduce social inequalities in smoking—by explicitly seeking stratified outcome data in new systematic reviews, by re-analysing original datasets, and/or by meta-analysis of individual participant data.

Keywords: systematic reviews; health inequalities; evidence based policy

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S Thomas, D Fayter, K Misso, D Ogilvie, M Petticrew, A Sowden, M Whitehead, and G Worthy Population tobacco control interventions and their effects on social inequalities in smoking: systematic review Tob. Control, August 1, 2008; 17(4): 230 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Huisman, J. Brug, and J. Mackenbach Absinthe is its history relevant for current public health? Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2007; 36(4): 738 - 744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Waters, J. Doyle, N. Jackson, F. Howes, G. Brunton, and A. Oakley Evaluating the effectiveness of public health interventions: the role and activities of the Cochrane Collaboration. J. Epidemiol. Community Health, April 1, 2006; 60(4): 285 - 289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]