RESEARCH PAPER

Tobacco and transition: an overview of industry investments, impact and influence in the former Soviet Union

A B Gilmore, M McKee

European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr A Gilmore
European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK; anna.gilmore{at}lshtm.ac.uk

Objectives: To quantify the contribution the tobacco industry has made to foreign direct investment (FDI) in the former Soviet Union (FSU) as an indicator of its political and economic leverage; to explore the impact this has had on production capacity and tobacco control in the region.

Design: Data on industry investment and its impact on cigarette production capacity were collated from industry journals, reports, and websites. Data on total FDI were obtained from the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development.

Results: By the end of 2000, transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) had invested over US$2.7 billion in 10 countries of the FSU. Tobacco money as a proportion of FDI varies from 1% to over 30% in Uzbekistan. Cigarette production capacity in the factories receiving investments tripled from 146 to 416 billion cigarettes per annum and the TTCs’ market share has increased from nothing to between 50–100% in the markets in which they invested. Findings suggest that the effectiveness of national tobacco control measures corresponds broadly to the nature of the political and economic transition in each country and the size of industry investment, which is determined in part by the political context. Thus more effective measures tend to be seen in democratic states with smaller or no industry investments while the least effective measures are seen in highly centralised, one party states with high levels of industry investment or those with limited governmental capacity.

Conclusions: The entry of the TTCs at a time of major political and economic change left the FSU particularly vulnerable to industry influence. This influence was enhanced by the industry’s significant contribution to FDI, their ability to take over existing state monopolies in all but the largest countries, and the lack of democratic opposition.

Abbreviations: BAT, British American Tobacco; EBRD, European Bank of Reconstruction and Development; FDI, foreign direct investment; FSU, former Soviet Union; IMF, International Monetary Fund; TTCs, transnational tobacco companies

Keywords: former Soviet Union; tobacco industry; transition

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Holden, C., Lee, K. (2009). Corporate Power and Social Policy: The Political Economy of the Transnational Tobacco Companies. Global Social Policy 9: 328-354 [Abstract]  
• Stickley, A., Carlson, P. (2009). The social and economic determinants of smoking in Moscow, Russia. Scand J Public Health 37: 632-639 [Abstract]  
• Mamudu, H. M., Hammond, R., Glantz, S. A. (2008). Project Cerberus: Tobacco Industry Strategy to Create an Alternative to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. AJPH 98: 1630-1642 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Danishevski, K, Gilmore, A, McKee, M (2008). Public attitudes towards smoking and tobacco control policy in Russia. Tobacco Control 17: 276-283 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gilmore, A., Collin, J., Townsend, J. (2007). Transnational Tobacco Company Influence on Tax Policy During Privatization of a State Monopoly: British American Tobacco and Uzbekistan. AJPH 97: 2001-2009 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Perlman, F., Bobak, M., Gilmore, A., McKee, M. (2007). Trends in the prevalence of smoking in Russia during the transition to a market economy. Tobacco Control 16: 299-305 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gilmore, A. B, McKee, M., Collin, J. (2007). The invisible hand: how British American Tobacco precluded competition in Uzbekistan. Tobacco Control 16: 239-247 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bobak, M, Gilmore, A, McKee, M, Rose, R, Marmot, M (2006). Changes in smoking prevalence in Russia, 1996-2004.. Tobacco Control 15: 131-135 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gilmore, A. B, Collin, J., McKee, M. (2006). British American Tobacco's erosion of health legislation in Uzbekistan. BMJ 332: 355-358 [Full Text]  
• Kralikova, E., Podmaniczky, E., Stypulkowska-Misiurewicz, H., Kavcova, E., Veryga, A., Muller, T. (2005). Making the transition to action. BMJ 331: 191-192 [Full Text]  
• Gilmore, A B, McKee, M (2005). Exploring the impact of foreign direct investment on tobacco consumption in the former Soviet Union. Tobacco Control 14: 13-21 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• McKee, M., Nolte, E. (2004). Lessons from health during the transition from communism. BMJ 329: 1428-1429 [Full Text]  
• Gilmore, A., Pomerleau, J., McKee, M., Rose, R., Haerpfer, C. W., Rotman, D., Tumanov, S. (2004). Prevalence of Smoking in 8 Countries of the Former Soviet Union: Results From the Living Conditions, Lifestyles and Health Study. AJPH 94: 2177-2187 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gilmore, A B, McKee, M (2004). Moving East: how the transnational tobacco industry gained entry to the emerging markets of the former Soviet Union--part II: an overview of priorities and tactics used to establish a manufacturing presence. Tobacco Control 13: 151-160 [Abstract] [Full Text]