HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gilmore, A B Articles by McKee, M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gilmore, A B Articles by McKee, M Related Collections Economics of tobacco use and control Advertising and Marketing

Moving East: how the transnational tobacco industry gained entry to the emerging markets of the former Soviet Union—part II: an overview of priorities and tactics used to establish a manufacturing presence

European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition (ECOHOST), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr Anna B Gilmore
European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK; anna.gilmore{at}lshtm.ac.uk

Objectives: To explore how British American Tobacco (BAT), having established cigarette imports, responded to the opportunities for investment in cigarette manufacturing in the former Soviet Union (FSU).

Design: Analysis of documents held at the BAT archive in Guildford, UK.

Results: Considerable priority was attached to investing in the FSU. This led BAT to undertake a major organisational change and to intense competition to acquire assets. BAT used flawed economic arguments to persuade cash starved governments that its investment would reap economic rewards. It offered excise advice that disadvantaged governments while benefiting BAT, confused issues over pricing, and avoided competitive tendering. BAT targeted agriculture ministries, using its expertise in leaf production to differentiate itself from other potential investors. It subverted the principles of corporate social responsibility to promote itself as a business partner. BAT’s task was made easier by the naivety of post-Soviet governments and by the international financial organisations’ support for rapid economic reform. The latter permitted tobacco transnationals to penetrate markets before effective competitive tendering processes had been established, giving them the opportunity to minimise prices and establish monopolies.

Conclusions: Many of the arguments employed when penetrating post-Soviet markets were highly misleading but governments lacked expertise to realise this. There is a need to build tobacco control capacity in transition economies, within and outside government, to ensure that governments are better informed of the true economic and health impacts of tobacco. Rapid transition from socialist to market economies without establishing regulatory institutional structures may be dangerous when investing companies use business practices that fall short of international standards.

Abbreviations: BAT, British American Tobacco; BATUKE, BAT United Kingdom and Export; EBRD, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development; IMF, International Monetary Fund; NBD, New Business Development; FSU, former Soviet Union; TTCs, transnational tobacco companies

Keywords: tobacco industry documents; former Soviet Union; market entry

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Gilmore, J. Collin, and J. Townsend Transnational Tobacco Company Influence on Tax Policy During Privatization of a State Monopoly: British American Tobacco and Uzbekistan Am J Public Health, November 1, 2007; 97(11): 2001 - 2009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Perlman, M. Bobak, A. Gilmore, and M. McKee Trends in the prevalence of smoking in Russia during the transition to a market economy Tob. Control, October 1, 2007; 16(5): 299 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. B Gilmore, M. McKee, and J. Collin The invisible hand: how British American Tobacco precluded competition in Uzbekistan Tob. Control, August 1, 2007; 16(4): 239 - 247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Chaiton, R. Ferrence, and E. LeGresley Perceptions of industry responsibility and tobacco control policy by US tobacco company executives in trial testimony Tob. Control, December 1, 2006; 15(suppl_4): iv98 - iv106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. LeGresley, M. E. Muggli, and R. D. Hurt Movie Moguls: British American Tobacco's covert strategy to promote cigarettes in Eastern Europe Eur J Public Health, October 1, 2006; 16(5): 505 - 508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A B Gilmore and M McKee Exploring the impact of foreign direct investment on tobacco consumption in the former Soviet Union Tob. Control, February 1, 2005; 14(1): 13 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K Lee, A B Gilmore, and J Collin Breaking and re-entering: British American Tobacco in China 1979-2000 Tob. Control, December 1, 2004; 13(suppl_2): ii88 - ii95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R MacKenzie, J Collin, C Sopharo, and Y Sopheap "Almost a role model of what we would like to do everywhere": British American Tobacco in Cambodia Tob. Control, December 1, 2004; 13(suppl_2): ii112 - ii117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]