Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Tobacco Control 2004;13:151-160; doi:10.1136/tc.2003.005207
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Tobacco Control 2004;13:151-160
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

RESEARCH PAPER

Moving East: how the transnational tobacco industry gained entry to the emerging markets of the former Soviet Union—part II: an overview of priorities and tactics used to establish a manufacturing presence

A B Gilmore, M McKee

European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition (ECOHOST), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Anna B Gilmore
European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK; anna.gilmore{at}lshtm.ac.uk

Objectives: To explore how British American Tobacco (BAT), having established cigarette imports, responded to the opportunities for investment in cigarette manufacturing in the former Soviet Union (FSU).

Design: Analysis of documents held at the BAT archive in Guildford, UK.

Results: Considerable priority was attached to investing in the FSU. This led BAT to undertake a major organisational change and to intense competition to acquire assets. BAT used flawed economic arguments to persuade cash starved governments that its investment would reap economic rewards. It offered excise advice that disadvantaged governments while benefiting BAT, confused issues over pricing, and avoided competitive tendering. BAT targeted agriculture ministries, using its expertise in leaf production to differentiate itself from other potential investors. It subverted the principles of corporate social responsibility to promote itself as a business partner. BAT’s task was made easier by the naivety of post-Soviet governments and by the international financial organisations’ support for rapid economic reform. The latter permitted tobacco transnationals to penetrate markets before effective competitive tendering processes had been established, giving them the opportunity to minimise prices and establish monopolies.

Conclusions: Many of the arguments employed when penetrating post-Soviet markets were highly misleading but governments lacked expertise to realise this. There is a need to build tobacco control capacity in transition economies, within and outside government, to ensure that governments are better informed of the true economic and health impacts of tobacco. Rapid transition from socialist to market economies without establishing regulatory institutional structures may be dangerous when investing companies use business practices that fall short of international standards.

Abbreviations: BAT, British American Tobacco; BATUKE, BAT United Kingdom and Export; EBRD, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development; IMF, International Monetary Fund; NBD, New Business Development; FSU, former Soviet Union; TTCs, transnational tobacco companies

Keywords: tobacco industry documents; former Soviet Union; market entry


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Danishevski, K, Gilmore, A, McKee, M (2008). Public attitudes towards smoking and tobacco control policy in Russia. Tobacco Control 17: 276-283 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gilmore, A., Collin, J., Townsend, J. (2007). Transnational Tobacco Company Influence on Tax Policy During Privatization of a State Monopoly: British American Tobacco and Uzbekistan. AJPH 97: 2001-2009 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Perlman, F., Bobak, M., Gilmore, A., McKee, M. (2007). Trends in the prevalence of smoking in Russia during the transition to a market economy. Tobacco Control 16: 299-305 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gilmore, A. B, McKee, M., Collin, J. (2007). The invisible hand: how British American Tobacco precluded competition in Uzbekistan. Tobacco Control 16: 239-247 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chaiton, M., Ferrence, R., LeGresley, E. (2006). Perceptions of industry responsibility and tobacco control policy by US tobacco company executives in trial testimony. Tobacco Control 15: iv98-iv106 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • LeGresley, E. M., Muggli, M. E., Hurt, R. D. (2006). Movie Moguls: British American Tobacco's covert strategy to promote cigarettes in Eastern Europe. Eur J Public Health 16: 505-508 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gilmore, A B, McKee, M (2005). Exploring the impact of foreign direct investment on tobacco consumption in the former Soviet Union. Tobacco Control 14: 13-21 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lee, K, Gilmore, A B, Collin, J (2004). Breaking and re-entering: British American Tobacco in China 1979-2000. Tobacco Control 13: ii88-ii95 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • MacKenzie, R, Collin, J, Sopharo, C, Sopheap, Y (2004). "Almost a role model of what we would like to do everywhere": British American Tobacco in Cambodia. Tobacco Control 13: ii112-ii117 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.