Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fidan, F
Right arrow Articles by Sevinc, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fidan, F
Right arrow Articles by Sevinc, C
Related Collections
Right arrow Health effects of tobacco use
Right arrow Smoking cessation
Tobacco Control 2004;13:161-166
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


RESEARCH PAPER

Airway disease risk from environmental tobacco smoke among coffeehouse workers in Turkey

F Fidan, A H Cimrin, G Ergor, C Sevinc

Dokuz Eylul University Medical Faculty, Chest and Public Health Departments, Alsancak Izmir, Turkey

Correspondence to:
A H Cimrin
Dokuz Eylul University Medical Faculty, Chest Department, 1440 SK 18/5 Karaferya Apt, Alsancak Izmir 35220, Turkey; acimrin{at}deu.edu.tr

Objectives: To examine the effect of ETS exposure on respiratory symptoms and pulmonary function and to compare workers in coffeehouses to those in other occupations in order to assess the risk of respiratory illness in this occupation.

Design: Cross sectional study.

Setting: The study area consisted of the three metropolitan districts of the city of Izmir, Turkey. 86 coffeehouses and 80 other small scale shops which had no known respiratory risk factor, located in the same area, were taken as the study group.

Subjects: 207 workers were assessed.

Main outcome measurements: Subjects answered a questionnaire about demographic and working characteristics, respiratory symptoms, and smoking behaviour. Physical examinations and spirometric measurements were carried out at the workplaces.

Results: There was a significant increase in respiratory symptoms in coffeehouse workers. Working in a coffeehouse showed a significant risk for chronic bronchitis (odds ratio (OR) 4.3). In coffeehouse workers, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) decreased 5.1%, forced vital capacity (FVC) 3.4%, FEV1/FVC 1.6%, peak expiratory flow (PEF) 6.45%, and forced expiratory flow (FEF25) 7.2%, FEF50 10%, and FEF25–75 9.8%. Among workers who were described as having an "airway disease", coffeehouse workers were significantly greater in number. When age, body mass index, and smoking behaviour were controlled, working in a coffeehouse was strongly associated with "airway disease" compared to other workers (OR 5.35, 95% confidence interval 2.41 to 11.87).

Conclusions: Workers in coffeehouses showed significant increases in respiratory symptoms and decreased pulmonary function. All workers need to gain an awareness of these occupational risks and working conditions should be improved immediately.


Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; ETS, environmental tobacco smoke; FEF, forced expiratory flow; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC, forced vital capacity; OR, odds ratio; PEF, peak expiratory flow

Keywords: environmental tobacco smoke; occupational respiratory effect; airway disease; chronic bronchitis; coffeehouse




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
Workers in eastern coffeehouses suffer effects of ETS
Occup. Environ. Med., October 1, 2004; 61(10): 823 - 823.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.