HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Willemsen, M C Articles by Hilberink, S R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Willemsen, M C Articles by Hilberink, S R Related Collections Environmental tobacco smoke Other Psychiatry

Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and determinants of support for complete smoking bans in psychiatric settings

¹ STIVORO—for a smoke free future, The Hague, The Netherlands
² Rescon Research and Consultancy, Haarlem, The Netherlands
³ Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), University Medical Centre St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Dr M C Willemsen
STIVORO—for a smoke free future, PO Box 16070, 2500 BB The Hague, The Netherlands; mwillemsen{at}stivoro.nl

Objective: To measure environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure in psychiatric settings and to assess determinants of support for complete smoking bans.

Design: Cross sectional study

Setting: Dutch psychiatric hospitals, outpatient care institutions, and sheltered home facilities.

Subjects: A random sample of 540 treatment staff, 306 attendants/nurses, and 93 patients.

Main outcome measures: Self reported ETS exposure, current smoking policy, compliance with smoking policy, beliefs about smoking bans.

Results: 87% of respondents were exposed to tobacco smoke in psychiatric institutions; 29% said that on an average day they were exposed to "a lot of smoke". Although ETS originates mainly from smoking patients, both non-compliance from patients and employees with existing bans resulted in non-smokers being exposed to ETS. Due to non-compliance, ETS exposure was quite high when there is a general smoking ban (designated areas option). Only with a complete ban was compliance good and employees sufficiently protected from ETS exposure. Psychiatrists, psychologists, physicians, attendants, and nurses were most concerned about resistance from patients, partly because of the fear of infringing on patients’ freedom to smoke.

Conclusions: Complete smoking bans are the only way to fully protect those working in psychiatry from ETS exposure, mainly because general smoking bans are not sufficiently complied with. Communication strategies to improve compliance with complete bans are crucial to protect those working in psychiatry from ETS. Compliance could be improved by addressing the belief that the ban will effectively result in less ETS exposure and the issue of patients’ freedom to smoke versus employees’ right to work in a smoke-free environment.

Abbreviations: ANOVA, analyses of variance; ETS, environmental tobacco smoke; NIP, Dutch Institute of Psychologists; NVPV, Dutch Association of Psychiatric Nurses; NVSPV, Dutch Association of Social Psychiatric Nurses

Keywords: policy; psychiatry; passive smoking; environmental tobacco smoke; ETS

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Smith and C. O'Callaghan Exploration of in-patient attitudes towards smoking within a large mental health trust Psychiatr. Bull., May 1, 2008; 32(5): 166 - 169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Jochelson Smoke-free legislation and mental health units: the challenges ahead The British Journal of Psychiatry, December 1, 2006; 189(6): 479 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Pilkington, S. Gray, A. B. Gilmore, and N. Daykin Attitudes towards second hand smoke amongst a highly exposed workforce: survey of London casino workers J. Public Health Med., June 1, 2006; 28(2): 104 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]