RESEARCH PAPER

Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and determinants of support for complete smoking bans in psychiatric settings

M C Willemsen¹, C A Görts², P Van Soelen¹, R Jonkers², S R Hilberink³

¹ STIVORO—for a smoke free future, The Hague, The Netherlands
² Rescon Research and Consultancy, Haarlem, The Netherlands
³ Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), University Medical Centre St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr M C Willemsen
STIVORO—for a smoke free future, PO Box 16070, 2500 BB The Hague, The Netherlands; mwillemsen{at}stivoro.nl

Objective: To measure environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure in psychiatric settings and to assess determinants of support for complete smoking bans.

Design: Cross sectional study

Setting: Dutch psychiatric hospitals, outpatient care institutions, and sheltered home facilities.

Subjects: A random sample of 540 treatment staff, 306 attendants/nurses, and 93 patients.

Main outcome measures: Self reported ETS exposure, current smoking policy, compliance with smoking policy, beliefs about smoking bans.

Results: 87% of respondents were exposed to tobacco smoke in psychiatric institutions; 29% said that on an average day they were exposed to "a lot of smoke". Although ETS originates mainly from smoking patients, both non-compliance from patients and employees with existing bans resulted in non-smokers being exposed to ETS. Due to non-compliance, ETS exposure was quite high when there is a general smoking ban (designated areas option). Only with a complete ban was compliance good and employees sufficiently protected from ETS exposure. Psychiatrists, psychologists, physicians, attendants, and nurses were most concerned about resistance from patients, partly because of the fear of infringing on patients’ freedom to smoke.

Conclusions: Complete smoking bans are the only way to fully protect those working in psychiatry from ETS exposure, mainly because general smoking bans are not sufficiently complied with. Communication strategies to improve compliance with complete bans are crucial to protect those working in psychiatry from ETS. Compliance could be improved by addressing the belief that the ban will effectively result in less ETS exposure and the issue of patients’ freedom to smoke versus employees’ right to work in a smoke-free environment.

Abbreviations: ANOVA, analyses of variance; ETS, environmental tobacco smoke; NIP, Dutch Institute of Psychologists; NVPV, Dutch Association of Psychiatric Nurses; NVSPV, Dutch Association of Social Psychiatric Nurses

Keywords: policy; psychiatry; passive smoking; environmental tobacco smoke; ETS

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Ratschen, E., Britton, J., McNeill, A. (2009). Implementation of smoke-free policies in mental health in-patient settings in England. Br. J. Psychiatry 194: 547-551 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wye, P. M., Bowman, J. A., Wiggers, J. H., Baker, A., Knight, J., Carr, V. J., Terry, M., Clancy, R. (2009). Smoking Restrictions and Treatment for Smoking: Policies and Procedures in Psychiatric Inpatient Units in Australia. Psychiatr. Serv. 60: 100-107 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Smith, J., O'Callaghan, C. (2008). Exploration of in-patient attitudes towards smoking within a large mental health trust. Psychiatr. Bull. 32: 166-169 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Jochelson, K. (2006). Smoke-free legislation and mental health units: the challenges ahead. Br. J. Psychiatry 189: 479-480 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pilkington, P. A., Gray, S., Gilmore, A. B., Daykin, N. (2006). Attitudes towards second hand smoke amongst a highly exposed workforce: survey of London casino workers. J Public Health (Oxf) 28: 104-110 [Abstract] [Full Text]