HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Read responses to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mandel, L L Articles by Glantz, S A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mandel, L L Articles by Glantz, S A Related Collections Environmental tobacco smoke

Hedging their bets: tobacco and gambling industries work against smoke-free policies

Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

Correspondence to:
Professor Stanton A Glantz PhD
Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, Room 366 Library, 530 Parnassus, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143–1390, USA; glantz{at}medicine.ucsf.edu

Objective: To describe and understand the relationship between the tobacco and gambling industries in connection to their collaborative efforts to prevent smoke-free casinos and gambling facilities and fight smoke-free policies generally.

Methods: Analysis of tobacco industry documents available online (accessed between February and December 2003).

Results: The tobacco industry has worked to convince the gambling industry to fight against smoke-free environments. Representatives of the gambling industry with ties to the tobacco industry oppose smoke-free workplaces by claiming that smoke-free environments hurt gambling revenue and by promoting ventilation as a solution to secondhand smoke. With help from the tobacco industry, the gambling industry has become a force at the American Society of Heating Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers opposing smoke-free ventilation standards for the hospitality industry.

Conclusion: Tobacco industry strategies to mobilise the gambling industry to oppose smoke-free environments are consistent with past strategies to co-opt the hospitality industry and with strategies to influence policy from behind the scenes. Tobacco control advocates need to be aware of the connections between the tobacco and gambling industries in relation to smoke-free environments and work to expose them to the public and to policy makers.

Abbreviations: AGA, American Gaming Association; AHA, Australian Hotels Association; ASHRAE, American Society of Heating Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers; HCIAQ, Hospitality Coalition on Indoor Air Quality; HVAC, heating, ventilation and air conditioning; IAQ, indoor air quality; OSHA, Occupational Safety and Health Administration; PM, Philip Morris; RJR, RJ Reynolds

Keywords: American Society of Heating Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers; ASHRAE; environmental tobacco smoke; policy; politics; tobacco smoke pollution

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C A Pritsos, K L Pritsos, and K E Spears Smoking rates among gamblers at Nevada casinos mirror US smoking rate Tob. Control, April 1, 2008; 17(2): 82 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. L. York and E. J. Hahn The Community Readiness Model: Evaluating Local Smoke-Free Policy Development Policy Politics Nursing Practice, August 1, 2007; 8(3): 184 - 200. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P A McDaniel, E A Smith, and R E Malone Philip Morris's Project Sunrise: weakening tobacco control by working with it Tob. Control, June 1, 2006; 15(3): 215 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters: