Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, C A
Right arrow Articles by Zuo, Y
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, C A
Right arrow Articles by Zuo, Y
Tobacco Control 2004;13:277-282
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


RESEARCH PAPER

Out of the Smokescreen: does an anti-smoking advertisement affect young women’s perception of smoking in movies and their intention to smoke?

C A Edwards, W C Harris, D R Cook, K F Bedford, Y Zuo

Health Promotion, Central Coast and Central Sydney, NSW, Australia

Correspondence to:
Ms Christine A Edwards
Health Promotion, Central Coast Health, PO Box 361, Gosford 2250, NSW, Australia; cedwards{at}doh.health.nsw.gov.au

Objective: To evaluate the effect of an anti-smoking advertisement on young women’s perceptions of smoking in movies and their intention to smoke.

Subjects/setting: 2038 females aged 12–17 years attending cinemas in New South Wales, Australia.

Design/intervention: Quasi-experimental study of patrons, who were surveyed after having viewed a movie at their local cinema. The control group was surveyed during week 1 and the intervention group, during week 2. Before seeing the movie in week 2, a 30 second anti-smoking advertisement was shown, which featured a well known female actor drawing attention to the prevalence of smoking in movies.

Outcomes: Attitude of current smokers and non-smokers to smoking in the movies; intention of current smokers and non-smokers to be smoking in 12 months time.

Results: Among non-smokers, 48.2% of the intervention subjects thought that the smoking in the movie they viewed was "not OK" compared with 28.3% of the control subjects (p < 0.0001). However, there was no difference among smokers in the intervention (26.4%) and control (16.9%) groups (p = 0.28). A higher percentage of current smokers in the intervention group indicated they were unlikely to smoke in 12 months time (47.8%) than smokers in the control condition (31.9%) (p = 0.03). For non-smokers, there was no difference in smoking intentions between conditions, with 95% saying they would be unlikely to be smoking in 12 months time.

Conclusions: This "real world" study suggests that placing an anti-smoking advertisement before movies containing smoking scenes can help to "immunise" young women against the influences of film stars smoking.


Keywords: anti-smoking advertisement; smoking in movies; cinema advertising; product placement




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
C. Edwards, W. Oakes, and D. Bull
Out of the smokescreen II: will an advertisement targeting the tobacco industry affect young people's perception of smoking in movies and their intention to smoke?
Tob. Control, June 1, 2007; 16(3): 177 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
M.-L. Lochen, I. Torhild Gram, S. Skattebo, and N. Kolstrup
Tobacco images and texts in Norwegian magazines and newspapers
Scand J Public Health, January 1, 2007; 35(1): 31 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. Charlesworth and S. A. Glantz
Smoking in the Movies Increases Adolescent Smoking: A Review
Pediatrics, December 1, 2005; 116(6): 1516 - 1528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.