Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Tobacco Control 2004;13:362-369; doi:10.1136/tc.2004.007914
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Tobacco Control 2004;13:362-369
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

RESEARCH PAPER

A nicotine delivery device without the nicotine? Tobacco industry development of low nicotine cigarettes

J Dunsby1 and L Bero2

1 Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, USA
2 Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute for Health Policy Studies, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Lisa Bero
3333 California Street, Suite 420, San Francisco, CA 92143-0613 (94118 express mail only), USA; bero{at}medicine.ucsf.edu

Background: Defining harm reduction and regulating potentially reduced exposure products (PREPs), including low nicotine products, are key issues in tobacco control policy. The US Congress has been considering legislation authorising the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to regulate tobacco products.

Objective: To investigate tobacco industry perceptions, interests, motivations, and knowledge regarding the marketability of low nicotine tobacco products.

Methods: Qualitative analysis of internal tobacco industry documents identified in the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library between February 2002 and June 2004. Search terms included low-, no-, reduced-nicotine; denicotinization; low-, reduced- alkaloids; Next; de-nic; and key names of people, organisations, projects, and their common abbreviations and acronyms.

Results: The tobacco industry has made repeated efforts to develop low nicotine cigarettes. Reasons for doing so include consumer appeal and economic importance in a highly competitive cigarette market for "healthier" products. The industry considered the development of a new "denic" market segment a critical challenge.

Conclusions: The tobacco industry exploits consumer misunderstanding of the health effects of nicotine in development and marketing efforts. The industry has risked the development of a less addictive product to expand the market reach of tobacco products based on perceived health benefits and appeal to quitters.

Abbreviations: ART, alkaloid reduced tobacco; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; PREPs, potentially reduced exposure products

Keywords: addiction; harm reduction; marketing; nicotine; product development


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • MunafU, M. R. (2006). Harm reduction: lessons learned from tobacco control. J Psychopharmacol 20: 329-330  
  • Stanwick, R (2005). Canada gets its house in order. Inj. Prev. 11: 259-260 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.