HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pilkington, P Articles by Gilmore, A B Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pilkington, P Articles by Gilmore, A B Related Collections Environmental tobacco smoke

The Living Tomorrow Project: how Philip Morris has used a Belgian tourist attraction to promote ventilation approaches to the control of second hand smoke

European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Paul Pilkington
University of the West of England, Faculty of Health and Social Care, Glenside Campus, Blackberry Hill, Stapleton, Bristol, BS16 1DD, UK; paul.pilkington{at}uwe.ac.uk

Study objective: To examine the involvement of Philip Morris in Living Tomorrow 2 and determine the rationale behind its involvement.

Design: Research was conducted through a web based search of internal tobacco industry documents made publicly available through litigation.

Main results: For approximately 1 000 000 Philip Morris (now Altria) became a co-initiator of Living Tomorrow 2, a tourist complex in Belgium that aims to demonstrate how we will be living in the future. In addition to promoting the company and its grocery products, Philip Morris is using the complex and its website to promote ventilation as a means of accommodating smokers and non-smokers in the indoor environment. Particular emphasis was placed on the bar and restaurant areas. Despite the rationale for its involvement, Philip Morris fails to acknowledge its role as a cigarette manufacturer. As a form of corporate sponsorship Philip Morris thought its involvement could evade any European tobacco advertising ban.

Conclusions: Philip Morris is using a tourist attraction to promote its views on control of second hand smoke (SHS) and accommodation of smokers and non-smokers in the indoor environment. However, ventilation does not deal with the health effects of SHS. Policymakers must be cognisant of the devious tactics the industry employs to promote its own agenda, especially in relation to indoor air quality and smoking in public places. Tobacco control legislation should be continually modified and strengthened in response to the changing activities of the tobacco industry as it strives to evade existing legislation and deter the advent of new legislation.

Abbreviations: EU, European Union; HBI, Healthy Buildings International; HVAC, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning; SHS, second hand smoke

Keywords: Sponsorship; tobacco industry; ventilation

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P A McDaniel, E A Smith, and R E Malone Philip Morris's Project Sunrise: weakening tobacco control by working with it Tob. Control, June 1, 2006; 15(3): 215 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P M Ling and S A Glantz Tobacco industry consumer research on socially acceptable cigarettes Tob. Control, October 1, 2005; 14(5): e3 - e3. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]