Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Tobacco Control 2004;13:403-408; doi:10.1136/tc.2004.007468
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Tobacco Control 2004;13:403-408
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

RESEARCH PAPER

Adults only: the prevalence of tobacco promotions in bars and clubs in the Boston area

L Biener1, A L Nyman1, R L Kline2 and A B Albers3

1 Center for Survey Research, University of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
2 Tobacco Control Resource Center, Northeastern University School of Law, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
3 Social and Behavioral Sciences Department, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Lois Biener
Center for Survey Research, University of Massachusetts at Boston, 100 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, MA 02125, USA; lois.biener{at}umb.edu

Objective: To document the nature and prevalence of tobacco promotions in bars and clubs in a major US city.

Design: We conducted systematic observations in a representative sample of 38 establishments in the Boston area, half of which had been advertised in a tobacco company ad. We also observed seven events in six additional clubs hosting Camel Casbah promotions. Telephone interviews were later completed with club managers.

Main outcome measure: Use of branded give-away items, distribution of free cigarette samples, managers’ reports of costs and benefits of hosting promotions.

Results: The majority of the 38 clubs were observed to use bar paraphernalia including matchbooks with tobacco brand logos, regardless of their history of appearing in tobacco sponsored ads. Free cigarette samples were not observed at any of the sampled clubs, but were a feature of every Casbah event. Managers of clubs in the advertised group were somewhat more likely to report having hosted promotions, but 44% of managers of non-advertised clubs indicated that tobacco promotions had occurred in their establishments in the past. Approximately one third of club managers viewed public links with a tobacco company as a negative feature of hosting promotions.

Conclusions: Based on managers’ reports, tobacco promotions occurred in more than 50% of the Boston area entertainment venues frequented by young adults. Cigarette companies should be required to inform the attorney general of plans to conduct promotions in adult-only venues to facilitate monitoring of compliance with the Master Settlement Agreement. The negative health and business consequences of hosting promotions should be communicated to bar owners.

Keywords: Master Settlement Agreement; bar promotions; tobacco marketing; young adults


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Dilley, J A, Spigner, C, Boysun, M J, Dent, C W, Pizacani, B A (2008). Does tobacco industry marketing excessively impact lesbian, gay and bisexual communities?. Tobacco Control 17: 385-390 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gilpin, E A, White, V M, Pierce, J P (2005). How effective are tobacco industry bar and club marketing efforts in reaching young adults?. Tobacco Control 14: 186-192 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.