Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drope, J
Right arrow Articles by Glantz, S A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drope, J
Right arrow Articles by Glantz, S A
Tobacco Control 2004;13:i41
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


RESEARCH PAPER

Tobacco industry efforts to present ventilation as an alternative to smoke-free environments in North America

J Drope1, S A Bialous2, S A Glantz1

1 Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
2 Tobacco Policy International, San Francisco, California, USA

Correspondence to:
Stanton A Glantz PhD
Box 1390, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-1390, USA; glantz{at}medicine.ucsf.edu

Objective: To describe how the tobacco industry developed a network of consultants to promote ventilation as a "solution" to secondhand smoke (SHS) in the USA.

Methods: Analysis of previously secret tobacco industry documents.

Results: As with its other strategies to undermine the passage of clean indoor legislation and regulations, the tobacco industry used consultants who represented themselves as independent but who were promoting the industry’s ventilation "solution" strategies under close, but generally undisclosed, industry supervision. The nature of the industry’s use of ventilation consultants evolved over time. In the 1980s, the industry used them in an effort to steer the concerns about indoor air quality away from secondhand smoke, saying SHS was an insignificant component of a much larger problem of indoor air quality and inadequate ventilation. By the 1990s, the industry and its consultants were maintaining that adequate ventilation could easily accommodate "moderate smoking". The consultants carried the ventilation message to businesses, particularly the hospitality business, and to local and national and international regulatory and legislative bodies.

Conclusion: While the tobacco industry and its consultants have gone to considerable lengths to promote the tobacco industry’s ventilation "solution", this strategy has had limited success in the USA, probably because, in the end, it is simpler, cheaper, and healthier to end smoking. Tobacco control advocates need to continue to educate policymakers about this fact, particularly in regions where this strategy has been more effective.


Abbreviations: ACVA, Air Conditioning & Ventilation Analysis; ASHRAE, American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers; BCIA, Business Council on Indoor Air; CIAR, Center for Indoor Air Research; ETS, environmental tobacco smoke; HBI, Healthy Building International; HVAC, heating ventilation and air conditioning; IAQ, indoor air quality; FACT, filtered air control technology; ORNL, Oak Ridge National Laboratory; OSHA, Occupational Safety and Health Association; PM, Philip Morris; RSP, respirable suspended particulate; SHS, secondhand smoke; TDS&A, Theodore D Sterling and Associates; TI, Tobacco Institute; VTS, ventilation technology systems




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
R. Taylor, F. Najafi, and A. Dobson
Meta-analysis of studies of passive smoking and lung cancer: effects of study type and continent
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2007; 36(5): 1048 - 1059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
E. M Sebrie and S. A Glantz
"Accommodating" smoke-free policies: tobacco industry's Courtesy of Choice programme in Latin America
Tob. Control, October 1, 2007; 16(5): e6 - e6.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
S. A Glantz
Commentary: Assessing the effects of the Scottish Smokefree Law--the placebo effect and the importance of obtaining unbiased data
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2007; 36(1): 155 - 156.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
P A McDaniel, E A Smith, and R E Malone
Philip Morris's Project Sunrise: weakening tobacco control by working with it
Tob. Control, June 1, 2006; 15(3): 215 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
A Bornhauser, J McCarthy, and S A Glantz
German tobacco industry's successful efforts to maintain scientific and political respectability to prevent regulation of secondhand smoke.
Tob. Control, April 1, 2006; 15(2): e1 - e1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
I. L. Gee, A. F. R. Watson, J. Carrington, P. R. Edwards, M. van Tongeren, P. McElduff, and R. E. Edwards
Second-hand smoke levels in UK pubs and bars: do the English Public Health White Paper proposals go far enough?
J. Public Health Med., March 1, 2006; 28(1): 17 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
E M Sebrie, J Barnoya, E J Perez-Stable, and S A Glantz
Tobacco industry successfully prevented tobacco control legislation in Argentina
Tob. Control, October 1, 2005; 14(5): e2 - e2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
P M Ling and S A Glantz
Tobacco industry consumer research on socially acceptable cigarettes
Tob. Control, October 1, 2005; 14(5): e3 - e3.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
J. Pan, E. M. Barbeau, C. Levenstein, and E. D. Balbach
Smoke-Free Airlines and the Role of Organized Labor: A Case Study
Am J Public Health, March 1, 2005; 95(3): 398 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
E K Tong and S A Glantz
ARTIST (Asian regional tobacco industry scientist team): Philip Morris' attempt to exert a scientific and regulatory agenda on Asia
Tob. Control, December 1, 2004; 13(suppl_2): ii118 - ii124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
L L Mandel and S A Glantz
Hedging their bets: tobacco and gambling industries work against smoke-free policies
Tob. Control, September 1, 2004; 13(3): 268 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
J B Richmond, D M Burns, and K M Cummings
Public health and the power of individual action
Tob. Control, March 1, 2004; 13(90001): i1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
K Neilsen and S A Glantz
A tobacco industry study of airline cabin air quality: dropping inconvenient findings
Tob. Control, March 1, 2004; 13(90001): i20 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.