Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Assunta, M
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Assunta, M
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, S
Related Collections
Right arrow Smoking
Right arrow Tobacco use (youth)
Right arrow Smoking cessation
Tobacco Control 2004;13:ii37-ii42
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


RESEARCH PAPER

Industry sponsored youth smoking prevention programme in Malaysia: a case study in duplicity

M Assunta, S Chapman

School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Correspondence to:
Mary Assunta
School of Public Health, Room 129A, Edward Ford Building (A27), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; marya{at}health.usyd.edu.au

Objective: To review tobacco company strategies of using youth smoking prevention programmes to counteract the Malaysian government’s tobacco control legislation and efforts in conducting research on youth to market to them.

Methods: Systematic keyword and opportunistic website searches of formerly private internal industry documents. Search terms included Malay, cmtm, jaycees, YAS, and direct marketing; 195 relevant documents were identified for this paper.

Results: Industry internal documents reveal that youth anti-smoking programmes were launched to offset the government’s tobacco control legislation. The programme was seen as a strategy to lobby key politicians and bureaucrats for support in preventing the passage of legislation. However, the industry continued to conduct research on youth, targeted them in marketing, and considered the teenage market vital for its survival. Promotional activities targeting youth were also carried out such as sports, notably football and motor racing, and entertainment events and cash prizes. Small, affordable packs of cigarettes were crucial to reach new smokers.

Conclusion: The tobacco industry in Malaysia engaged in duplicitous conduct in regard to youth. By buying into the youth smoking issue it sought to move higher on the moral playing field and strengthen its relationship with government, while at the same time continuing to market to youth. There is no evidence that industry youth smoking prevention programmes were effective in reducing smoking; however, they were effective in diluting the government’s tobacco control legislation.


Abbreviations: BAT, British American Tobacco; B&W, Brown & Williamson; CMTM, Confederation of Malaysian Tobacco Manufacturers; JAYCEES, Junior Chambers of Malaysia; LSF, Lucky Strike Filter; MTC, Malaysian Tobacco Company; PM, Philip Morris; RJR, RJ Reynolds; YAMS, young adult male smokers; YAS, young adult smokers; YSP, youth smoking prevention

Keywords: Malaysia; youth prevention programme




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
E. M. Sebrie and S. A. Glantz
Attempts to Undermine Tobacco Control: Tobacco Industry "Youth Smoking Prevention" Programs to Undermine Meaningful Tobacco Control in Latin America
Am J Public Health, August 1, 2007; 97(8): 1357 - 1367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
J. K. Ibrahim and S. A. Glantz
The Rise and Fall of Tobacco Control Media Campaigns, 1967 2006
Am J Public Health, August 1, 2007; 97(8): 1383 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
M. Wakefield, K. McLeod, and C. L Perry
"Stay away from them until you're old enough to make a decision": tobacco company testimony about youth smoking initiation
Tob. Control, December 1, 2006; 15(suppl_4): iv44 - iv53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
N. Hafez and P. M Ling
Finding the Kool Mixx: how Brown & Williamson used music marketing to sell cigarettes.
Tob. Control, October 1, 2006; 15(5): 359 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
L Henriksen, A L Dauphinee, Y Wang, and S P Fortmann
Industry sponsored anti-smoking ads and adolescent reactance: test of a boomerang effect
Tob. Control, February 1, 2006; 15(1): 13 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
E M Sebrie, J Barnoya, E J Perez-Stable, and S A Glantz
Tobacco industry successfully prevented tobacco control legislation in Argentina
Tob. Control, October 1, 2005; 14(5): e2 - e2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
J Knight and S Chapman
"Asian yuppies...are always looking for something new and different": creating a tobacco culture among young Asians
Tob. Control, December 1, 2004; 13(suppl_2): ii22 - ii29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.