Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Assunta, M
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Assunta, M
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, S
Tobacco Control 2004;13:ii43-ii50
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


RESEARCH PAPER

A mire of highly subjective and ineffective voluntary guidelines: tobacco industry efforts to thwart tobacco control in Malaysia

M Assunta, S Chapman

School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Correspondence to:
Mary Assunta
School of Public Health, Room 129A, Edward Ford Building (A27), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; marya{at}health.usyd.edu.au

Objective: To describe tobacco industry efforts in Malaysia to thwart government efforts to regulate tobacco promotion and health warnings.

Methods: Systematic keyword and opportunistic website searches of formerly private tobacco industry internal documents made available through the Master Settlement Agreement and secondary websites; relevant information from news articles and financial reports.

Results: Commencing in the 1970s, the industry began to systematically thwart government tobacco control. Guidelines were successfully promoted in the place of legislation for over two decades. Even when the government succeeded in implementing regulations such as health warnings and advertising bans they were compromised and acted effectively to retard further progress for years to come.

Conclusion: Counter-measures to delay or thwart government efforts to regulate tobacco were initiated by the industry. Though not unique to Malaysia, the main difference lies in the degree to which strategies were used to successfully counter stringent tobacco control measures between 1970 and 1995.


Abbreviations: BAT, British American Tobacco; B&W, Brown & Williamson, CMTM, Confederation of Malaysian Tobacco Manufacturers; MTC, Malaysian Tobacco Company; RJR, RJ Reynolds; TMD, Trademark Diversification

Keywords: Malaysia; tobacco industry




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
H-H Yong, R Borland, D Hammond, B Sirirassamee, B Ritthiphakdee, R Awang, M Omar, F Kin, Z b. M Zain, W B Lee, et al.
Levels and correlates of awareness of tobacco promotional activities among adult smokers in Malaysia and Thailand: findings from the International Tobacco Control Southeast Asia (ITC-SEA) Survey
Tob. Control, January 1, 2008; 17(1): 46 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
E M Sebrie, J Barnoya, E J Perez-Stable, and S A Glantz
Tobacco industry successfully prevented tobacco control legislation in Argentina
Tob. Control, October 1, 2005; 14(5): e2 - e2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
J Knight and S Chapman
"A phony way to show sincerity, as we all well know": tobacco industry lobbying against tobacco control in Hong Kong
Tob. Control, December 1, 2004; 13(suppl_2): ii13 - ii21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
M Assunta and S Chapman
Industry sponsored youth smoking prevention programme in Malaysia: a case study in duplicity
Tob. Control, December 1, 2004; 13(suppl_2): ii37 - ii42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
M Assunta and S Chapman
"The world's most hostile environment": how the tobacco industry circumvented Singapore's advertising ban
Tob. Control, December 1, 2004; 13(suppl_2): ii51 - ii57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.