RESEARCH PAPER

"The world’s most hostile environment": how the tobacco industry circumvented Singapore’s advertising ban

M Assunta, S Chapman

School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Mary Assunta
School of Public Health, Room 129A, Edward Ford Building (A27), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia; marya{at}health.usyd.edu.au

Objective: To review how tobacco transnational companies conducted their business in the hostile environment of Singapore, attempting to counter some of the government’s tobacco control measures; to compare the Malaysian and the Singaporean governments’ stance on tobacco control and the direct bearing of this on the way the tobacco companies conduct their business.

Methods: Systematic keyword and opportunistic website searches of formerly private internal industry documents.

Results: The comprehensive prohibition on advertising did not prevent the companies from advertising cigarettes to Singaporeans. Both British American Tobacco and Philip Morris used Malaysian television to advertise into Singapore. To launch a new brand of cigarettes, Alpine, Philip Morris used a non-tobacco product, the Alpine wine cooler. Other creative strategies such as innovative packaging and display units at retailers were explored to overcome the restrictions. Philip Morris experimented with developing a prototype cigarette using aroma and sweetened tipping paper to target the young and health conscious. The industry sought to weaken the strong pack warnings. The industry distributed anti-smoking posters for youth to retailers but privately salivated over their market potential.

Abbreviations: BAT, British American Tobacco; STC, Singapore Tobacco Company; T/N, tar/nicotine; USIB, US international brands

Keywords: advertising ban; Singapore; tobacco industry

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Mamudu, H. M., Hammond, R., Glantz, S. A. (2008). Project Cerberus: Tobacco Industry Strategy to Create an Alternative to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. AJPH 98: 1630-1642 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sebrie, E. M., Glantz, S. A. (2007). Attempts to Undermine Tobacco Control: Tobacco Industry "Youth Smoking Prevention" Programs to Undermine Meaningful Tobacco Control in Latin America. AJPH 97: 1357-1367 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Anderson, S. J, Ling, P. M, Glantz, S. A (2007). Implications of the federal court order banning the terms "light" and "mild": what difference could it make?. Tobacco Control 16: 275-279 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sebrie, E M, Barnoya, J, Perez-Stable, E J, Glantz, S A (2005). Tobacco industry successfully prevented tobacco control legislation in Argentina. Tobacco Control 14: e2-e2 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Barnoya, J., Bialous, S. A., Glantz, S. A. (2005). Effective Interventions to Reduce Smoking-Induced Heart Disease Around the World: Time to Act. Circulation 112: 456-458 [Full Text]  
• Assunta, M, Chapman, S (2004). Industry sponsored youth smoking prevention programme in Malaysia: a case study in duplicity. Tobacco Control 13: ii37-ii42 [Abstract] [Full Text]