Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Assunta, M
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Assunta, M
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, S
Tobacco Control 2004;13:ii63-ii70
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


RESEARCH PAPER

The tobacco industry’s accounts of refining indirect tobacco advertising in Malaysia

M Assunta, S Chapman

School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Correspondence to:
Mary Assunta
School of Public Health, Room 129A Edward Ford Building, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia; marya{at}health.usyd.edu.au

Objective: To explore tobacco industry accounts of its use of indirect tobacco advertising and trademark diversification (TMD) in Malaysia, a nation with a reputation for having an abundance of such advertising.

Methods: Systematic keyword and opportunistic website searches of formerly private tobacco industry internal documents made available through the Master Settlement Agreement.

Results: 132 documents relevant to the topic were reviewed. TMD efforts were created to advertise cigarettes after advertising restrictions on direct advertising were imposed in 1982. To build public credibility the tobacco companies set up small companies and projected them as entities independent of tobacco. Each brand selected an activity or event such as music, travel, fashion, and sports that best suited its image. RJ Reynolds sponsored music events to advertise its Salem brand while Philip Morris used Marlboro World of Sports since advertising restrictions prevented the use of the Marlboro man in broadcast media. Despite a ban on tobacco advertisements in the mass media, tobacco companies were the top advertisers in the country throughout the 1980s and 1990s. The media’s dependence on advertising revenue and support from the ruling elite played a part in delaying efforts to ban indirect advertising.

Conclusion: Advertising is crucial for the tobacco industry. When faced with an advertising ban they created ways to circumvent it, such as TMDs.


Abbreviations: BAT, British American Tobacco; BWIT, Brown & Williamson International Tobacco; CMTM, Confederation of Malaysian Tobacco Manufacturers; ITPMS, International Tobacco Products Marketing Standards; MTC, Malaysian Tobacco Company (BAT’s local subsidiary); MWOS, Marlboro World Of Sports; NSC, National Sports Council; RJR, RJ Reynolds; RTM, Radio Television Malaysia; TMD, trademark diversifications

Keywords: advertising; Malaysia; tobacco industry




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
H-H Yong, R Borland, D Hammond, B Sirirassamee, B Ritthiphakdee, R Awang, M Omar, F Kin, Z b. M Zain, W B Lee, et al.
Levels and correlates of awareness of tobacco promotional activities among adult smokers in Malaysia and Thailand: findings from the International Tobacco Control Southeast Asia (ITC-SEA) Survey
Tob. Control, January 1, 2008; 17(1): 46 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
R. MacKenzie, J. Collin, and K. Sriwongcharoen
Thailand--lighting up a dark market: British American tobacco, sports sponsorship and the circumvention of legislation
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, January 1, 2007; 61(1): 28 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
N. Hafez and P. M Ling
Finding the Kool Mixx: how Brown & Williamson used music marketing to sell cigarettes.
Tob. Control, October 1, 2006; 15(5): 359 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
S J Anderson, T Dewhirst, and P M Ling
Every document and picture tells a story: using internal corporate document reviews, semiotics, and content analysis to assess tobacco advertising
Tob. Control, June 1, 2006; 15(3): 254 - 261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
J Knight and S Chapman
"Asian yuppies...are always looking for something new and different": creating a tobacco culture among young Asians
Tob. Control, December 1, 2004; 13(suppl_2): ii22 - ii29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
M Assunta and S Chapman
Industry sponsored youth smoking prevention programme in Malaysia: a case study in duplicity
Tob. Control, December 1, 2004; 13(suppl_2): ii37 - ii42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
M Assunta and S Chapman
A mire of highly subjective and ineffective voluntary guidelines: tobacco industry efforts to thwart tobacco control in Malaysia
Tob. Control, December 1, 2004; 13(suppl_2): ii43 - ii50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
M Assunta and S Chapman
"The world's most hostile environment": how the tobacco industry circumvented Singapore's advertising ban
Tob. Control, December 1, 2004; 13(suppl_2): ii51 - ii57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.