Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K
Right arrow Articles by Collin, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K
Right arrow Articles by Collin, J
Related Collections
Right arrow Advertising and Marketing
Tobacco Control 2004;13:ii88-ii95
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


RESEARCH PAPER

Breaking and re-entering: British American Tobacco in China 1979–2000

K Lee1, A B Gilmore2, J Collin1

1 Centre on Global Change and Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; kelley.lee{at}lshtm.ac.uk
2 European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

Correspondence to:
Dr Kelley Lee
Centre on Global Change and Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London UK WC1E 7HT; kelley.lee{at}lshtm.ac.uk

Objectives: To analyse the strategy used by British American Tobacco (BAT) to re-enter the Chinese market from 1979 to 2000 after historically dominating the market before the 1950s.

Design: Analysis of tobacco industry document files to date available only on-site at the Guildford Depository operated by BAT. An additional search of recent documents related to BAT, placed in the Minnesota Depository, was also carried out.

Results: BAT has been committed to regaining its historically dominant position in China since the country reopened to foreign companies in 1979. Initially, BAT remained cautious relative to competitors in seeking joint ventures, finding market access hindered by bureaucratic complexity, restrictions on foreign investment and imports quotas, and later an advertising ban. Instead, the documents suggest BAT strongly relied on illegal imports to expand market presence of State Express 555 and other key brands. It was only when risks to contraband sales increased that the company made greater efforts to establish a legal presence in the country. Attempts to stress the long history of BAT in China and a proclaimed commitment to corporate social responsibility have been used to facilitate later negotiations.

Conclusion: China has remained relatively closed to transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) during its transition to a market economy, maintaining a firm grip over foreign investment and imports. Nonetheless, BAT has circumvented such restrictions through illegal imports and exploitation of inconsistencies in the local enforcement of advertising bans. Governments need to understand and address the full range of market entry tactics by TTCs in order to ensure effective tobacco control.


Abbreviations: BAT, British American Tobacco; BATUKE, British American Tobacco United Kingdom Export; BCF, Beijing Cigarette Factory; BLI, Beijing Light Industry No. 1 Bureau; CORA, Consumer and Regulatory Affairs; CSR, corporate social responsibility; CITIC, China International Trust and Investment Service Corporation; MACHIMPEX, China National Machinery and Equipment Import and Export Corporation; CNNPC, China National Native Produce and Animal By-Products Import and Export Corporation; CNTC, China National Tobacco Corporation; CT, Chia Tai Investment Company; CTIEC, China Tobacco Import and Export Corporation; FCTC, Framework Convention on Tobacco Control; FSU, former Soviet Union; GATT, General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs; GT, general trade; JV, joint venture; NBD, New Business Development; PM, Philip Morris; PRC, People’s Republic of China; SEFK, State Express Filter King; SE555, State Express 555; SRBT, Sino-Russian Border Trade; STMA, State Tobacco Monopoly Administration; SUTL, Singapura United Trading Limited; TTC, transnational tobacco company; WTO, World Trade Organization

Keywords: China; market access; marketing strategy; policy influence; smuggling




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
A. Gilmore, J. Collin, and J. Townsend
Transnational Tobacco Company Influence on Tax Policy During Privatization of a State Monopoly: British American Tobacco and Uzbekistan
Am J Public Health, November 1, 2007; 97(11): 2001 - 2009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
F. Zhong and E. Yano
British American Tobacco's tactics during China's accession to the World Trade Organization
Tob. Control, April 1, 2007; 16(2): 133 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
M. Chaiton, R. Ferrence, and E. LeGresley
Perceptions of industry responsibility and tobacco control policy by US tobacco company executives in trial testimony
Tob. Control, December 1, 2006; 15(suppl_4): iv98 - iv106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
J Collin, E LeGresley, R MacKenzie, S Lawrence, and K Lee
Complicity in contraband: British American Tobacco and cigarette smuggling in Asia
Tob. Control, December 1, 2004; 13(suppl_2): ii104 - ii111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.