Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Erratum
Right arrow Correction (v14,p360)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mandel, L L
Right arrow Articles by Glantz, S A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mandel, L L
Right arrow Articles by Glantz, S A
Related Collections
Right arrow Environmental tobacco smoke
Right arrow Economics of tobacco use and control
Tobacco Control 2005;14:10-12
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


BRIEF REPORT

Smoke-free law did not affect revenue from gaming in Delaware

L L Mandel, B C Alamar, S A Glantz

Center for Tobacco Control, Research & Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

Correspondence to:
Professor Stanton A Glantz
Center for Tobacco Control, Research & Education, University of California, San Francisco, 530 Parnassus Ave, Suite 366, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA; glantz{at}medicine.ucsf.edu


ABSTRACT
Objective: To determine the effect of the Delaware smoke-free law on gaming revenue.

Methods: Linear regression of gaming revenue and average revenue per machine on a public policy variable, time, while controlling for economic activity and seasonal effects.

Results: The linear regression showed that the smoke-free law was associated with no effect on total revenue or average revenue per machine.

Conclusion: Smoke-free laws are associated with no change in gaming revenue.


Keywords: economics; gambling; gaming; public policy; tobacco smoke pollution




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
A Lal and M Siahpush
The effect of smoke-free policies on electronic gaming machine expenditure in Victoria, Australia
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, January 1, 2008; 62(1): 11 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
M. Eriksen and F. Chaloupka
The Economic Impact of Clean Indoor Air Laws
CA Cancer J Clin, November 1, 2007; 57(6): 367 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
M R Pakko
Smoke-free law did affect revenue from gaming in Delaware
Tob. Control, February 1, 2006; 15(1): 68 - 69.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Erratum
Stanton A Glantz, et al.
Tobacco Control Online, 23 May 2005 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.