Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilmore, A B
Right arrow Articles by McKee, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gilmore, A B
Right arrow Articles by McKee, M
Related Collections
Right arrow Tobacco use
Right arrow Economics of tobacco use and control
Tobacco Control 2005;14:13-21
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


RESEARCH PAPER

Exploring the impact of foreign direct investment on tobacco consumption in the former Soviet Union

A B Gilmore, M McKee

European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr Anna B Gilmore
European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK; anna.gilmore{at}lshtm.ac.uk

Background: Tobacco is the single largest cause of morbidity and mortality in the developed world; in the former socialist bloc tobacco kills twice as many men as in the west. Although evidence shows that liberalisation of the cigarette trade through the elimination of import barriers leads to significant increases in consumption, far less is known about the impact of foreign direct investment on cigarette consumption. This paper seeks to explore the impact that the substantial transnational tobacco company investments have had on patterns of tobacco trade and consumption in the former Soviet Union.

Design: Routine data were used to explore trends in cigarette trade and consumption in the 15 countries of the former Soviet Union from the 1960s to the present day. Comparisons were made between trends in countries that have received substantial investment from the tobacco transnationals and countries that have not.

Results: Between 1991 and 2000 cigarette production increased by 96% in countries receiving industry investment and by 11% in countries that did not. Over the same period cigarette consumption increased by 40%; the increase was concentrated in countries receiving investments. Despite these investments, cigarette imports still outweigh exports and no trade surplus has yet to result.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that liberalisation of inward investment has a significant and positive impact on cigarette consumption and that without appropriate safeguards, market liberalisation may have long term negative impacts on health. Specific trade rules are needed to govern trade and investment in this uniquely harmful product. Implementation of effective tobacco control policies should precede tobacco industry privatisation. International financial organisations pressing for privatisation should ensure this occurs.


Abbreviations: FAO, United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization; FDI, foreign direct investment; FSU, former Soviet Union; GATT, General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade; IMF, International Monetary Fund; TTCs, transnational tobacco companies; USDA FAS, US Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service

Keywords: former Soviet Union; tobacco consumption; trade liberalisation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
A. Gilmore, J. Collin, and J. Townsend
Transnational Tobacco Company Influence on Tax Policy During Privatization of a State Monopoly: British American Tobacco and Uzbekistan
Am J Public Health, November 1, 2007; 97(11): 2001 - 2009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
F. Perlman, M. Bobak, A. Gilmore, and M. McKee
Trends in the prevalence of smoking in Russia during the transition to a market economy
Tob. Control, October 1, 2007; 16(5): 299 - 305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
A. B Gilmore, M. McKee, and J. Collin
The invisible hand: how British American Tobacco precluded competition in Uzbekistan
Tob. Control, August 1, 2007; 16(4): 239 - 247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
B. McGrady
Trade liberalisation and tobacco control: moving from a policy of exclusion towards a more comprehensive policy
Tob. Control, August 1, 2007; 16(4): 280 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
T. I Andreeva and K. S Krasovsky
Changes in smoking prevalence in Ukraine in 2001-5
Tob. Control, June 1, 2007; 16(3): 202 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
P. Patel, J. Collin, and A. B Gilmore
"The law was actually drafted by us but the Government is to be congratulated on its wise actions": British American Tobacco and public policy in Kenya
Tob. Control, February 1, 2007; 16(1): e1 - e1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
E. K. Tong, L. England, and S. A. Glantz
Changing Conclusions on Secondhand Smoke in a Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Review Funded by the Tobacco Industry
Pediatrics, March 1, 2005; 115(3): e356 - e366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.