Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hiilamo, H T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hiilamo, H T
Tobacco Control 2005;14:22-30
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


RESEARCH PAPER

Tobacco control implications of the first European product liability suit

H T Hiilamo

Correspondence to:
Dr Heikki T Hiilamo
Church Council/Diaconia and Social Responsibility, Satamakatu 11, 00161 Helsinki, Finland; heikki.hiilamo{at}evl.fi

Objective: To examine tobacco control implication of the first European product liability suit in Finland.

Methods: Systematic search of internal tobacco industry documents available on the internet and at the British American Tobacco Guildford Depository.

Results: Despite legal loss, the litigation contributed to subsequent tobacco control legislation in Finland. The proceedings revealed that the industry had concealed the health hazards of its products and, despite indisputable evidence, continued to deny them. The positions taken by the industry rocked its reliability as a social actor and thus weakened its chances of influencing tobacco policy. Despite fierce opposition from the tobacco industry, tobacco products were included in the product liability legislation, tobacco was entered on the Finnish list of carcinogens, and an extensive Tobacco Act was passed in Parliament.

Conclusions: Tobacco litigation might not stand alone as a tool for public health policymaking but it may well stimulate national debate over the role of smoking in society and influence the policy agenda.


Abbreviations: BAT, British American Tobacco, B&W, Brown & Williams; JMF, Jacob, Medinger & Finnegan, PM, Philip Morris; PMI, PM International; RJR, RJ Reynolds; SHB, Shook, Hardy & Bacon

Keywords: Finland; tobacco documents; litigation







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.