Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Tobacco Control 2005;14:55-59; doi:10.1136/tc.2004.008375
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Tobacco Control 2005;14:55-59
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

RESEARCH PAPER

Smokers’ unrealistic optimism about their risk

N D Weinstein1, S E Marcus2 and R P Moser2

1 Department of Human Ecology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
2 Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Neil D Weinstein PhD
Department of Human Ecology, Rutgers University, Cook Office Building, 55 Dudley Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8520, USA; neilw{at}aesop.rutgers.edu

Objective: Past studies have produced ambiguous or inconsistent results when testing whether smokers actually underestimate their own risks of experiencing tobacco related illness. Whereas smokers claim that they are less at risk than the average smoker on self administered questionnaires, this unrealistic optimism has not been found in telephone or face-to-face interviews. We avoided the measurement problems of past studies and examined responses to a number of new questions to assess different aspects of smokers’ perceptions.

Methodology: A US national telephone survey (n = 6369; 1245 current smokers) posed a variety of questions designed to examine beliefs about the risks of smoking. For key questions, separate samples of smokers were asked either about their own risk or about the risk of the average smoker.

Results: Smokers underestimated their relative risk compared to non-smokers and, contrary to previous interview surveys, believed they have a lower risk of developing lung cancer than the average smoker. Furthermore, their perceived risk of lung cancer and of cancer in general barely increases with the number of cigarettes smoked per day, and their estimates of their risk of cancer are actually slightly lower than their estimates of their risk of lung cancer. Substantial proportions of smokers and former smokers agree with several myths, more than half agreeing that exercise undoes most smoking effects.

Conclusion: Smokers underestimate their risk of lung cancer both relative to other smokers and to non-smokers and demonstrate other misunderstandings of smoking risks. Smoking cannot be interpreted as a choice made in the presence of full information about the potential harm.

Keywords: risk accuracy; risk perception; smoking myths; unrealistic optimism


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Parascandola, M., Augustson, E., O'Connell, M. E., Marcus, S. (2009). Consumer awareness and attitudes related to new potential reduced-exposure tobacco product brands. Nicotine Tob Res 11: 886-895 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Smith, S M, Campbell, N C, MacLeod, U, Lee, A J, Raja, A, Wyke, S, Ziebland, S B, Duff, E M, Ritchie, L D, Nicolson, M C (2009). Factors contributing to the time taken to consult with symptoms of lung cancer: a cross-sectional study. Thorax 64: 523-531 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Yeretzian, J. S., Afifi, R. A. (2009). 'It won't happen to me': the knowledge-attitude nexus in adolescent smoking. J Public Health (Oxf) 0: fdp031v1-fdp031 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Moyer, A., Brown, M. (2008). Effect of Participation Incentives on the Composition of National Health Surveys. J Health Psychol 13: 870-873 [Abstract]  
  • Thun, M. J., Hannan, L. M., Stefanek, M. (2008). Risky Business: Tools to Improve Risk Communication in a Doctor's Office. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 100: 830-831 [Full Text]  
  • Young, R. P., Hopkins, R., Eaton, T. E. (2007). Forced expiratory volume in one second: not just a lung function test but a marker of premature death from all causes. Eur Respir J 30: 616-622 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Peretti-Watel, P., Constance, J., Guilbert, P., Gautier, A., Beck, F., Moatti, J.-P. (2007). Smoking too few cigarettes to be at risk? Smokers' perceptions of risk and risk denial, a French survey. Tobacco Control 16: 351-356 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Smith, E. A. (2007). 'It's interesting how few people die from smoking': Tobacco industry efforts to minimize risk and discredit health promotion. Eur J Public Health 17: 162-170 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kozlowski, L T, Edwards, B Q (2005). "Not safe" is not enough: smokers have a right to know more than there is no safe tobacco product. Tobacco Control 14: ii3-ii7 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chapman, S, Liberman, J (2005). Ensuring smokers are adequately informed: reflections on consumer rights, manufacturer responsibilities, and policy implications. Tobacco Control 14: ii8-ii13 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fox, B J (2005). Framing tobacco control efforts within an ethical context. Tobacco Control 14: ii38-ii44 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Marcovitch, H. (2005). What's new this month in BMJ Journals. BMJ 330: 870-870 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.