Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Tobacco Control 2005;14:93-98; doi:10.1136/tc.2004.009373
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Tobacco Control 2005;14:93-98
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

RESEARCH PAPER

The federal initiative to halt the sale of tobacco to children—the Synar Amendment, 1992–2000: lessons learned

J R DiFranza and G F Dussault

Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Joseph R DiFranza MD
Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, 55 Lake Avenue, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655, USA; difranzj{at}ummhc.org

Background: The Synar Amendment was enacted by the US Congress in 1992 to require states and territories to establish and enforce laws prohibiting the sale of tobacco to minors.

Objective: To describe state and federal efforts to comply with the Synar mandate.

Methods: State and federal actions were examined for the eight years following enactment.

Data sources: Federal documents from 1992–2003, annual block grant applications from 59 states and territories describing activities during federal fiscal years 1995–2000.

Measures: Whether applicants made a good faith effort to comply by enacting a law, enforcing it with inspections and penalties, conducting a valid survey and meeting violation rate targets set by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS).

Results: Between 1996 and 2000, 26 states had made a good faith effort to comply with Synar every year. In 2000, 57 jurisdictions (excluding Maryland and Montana) had established laws without loopholes, 57 conducted a valid survey, and 54 actively enforced their laws. By 2002, violation rates had dropped substantially everywhere but Alaska and a few small territories. No state reached the violation rate goal of 20% without penalising violators.

Conclusions: The Synar Amendment has resulted in the universal adoption of laws prohibiting tobacco sales to minors and almost universal enforcement of those laws, resulting in dramatically reduced violation rates. Implementation was slowed significantly by a lack of good faith effort in many states and by DHHS’s decision not to require states to enforce their laws by penalising lawbreakers.

Abbreviations: DHHS, Department of Health and Human Services; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; GAO, General Accounting Office; SAMHSA, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

Keywords: Synar Amendment; youth


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.