Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Tobacco Control 2005;14:207-212; doi:10.1136/tc.2004.010116
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Tobacco Control 2005;14:207-212
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

RESEARCH PAPER

Adolescent smoking decline during California’s tobacco control programme

J P Pierce, M M White, E A Gilpin

Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Rebecca and John Moores UCSD Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
John P Pierce
PhD, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Ca 92093-0645, USA; jppierce{at}ucsd.edu

Objective: California’s comprehensive tobacco control programme was 13 years old in 2002; by then, children entering adolescence at the start of the programme were young adults. This study examines whether adolescent smoking declined over this period, whether any decline carried through to young adulthood, and whether it was specific to California.

Setting and participants: Most data were from the 1990–2002 California Tobacco Surveys (CTS) (adolescents 12–17 years, > 5000/survey, young adults 18–24 years, > 1000/survey). Additional data were from the national 1992/93–2001/02 Current Population Survey (CPS) (young adults 18–24 years, > 15 000/survey).

Results: Over the 13 year period in California, ever puffing declined by 70% in 12–13 year olds, by 53% in 14–15 year olds from 1992–2002, and by 34% in 16–17 year olds from 1996–2002 (CTS). As noted, the decline commenced progressively later in each older group. Smoking experimentation (1+ cigarettes) and established smoking (> 100 cigarettes in lifetime) showed similar patterns. Compared to 1990, the percentage of California young adults (CTS data) who ever experimented declined by 14%, with half of the decline from 1999–2002. CPS young adult smoking prevalence (established and now smoke everyday or some days) was constant in the rest of the USA over the entire period, but California showed a recent 18% decline from 1998/99 to 2001/02.

Conclusions: California’s comprehensive programme may have kept new adolescent cohorts from experimenting with cigarettes. Low young adolescent experimentation rates at programme start appeared to carry through to young adulthood, resulting in a recent drop in young adult smoking prevalence in California not observed in the rest of the USA.

Abbreviations: CPS, Current Population Survey; CTS, California Tobacco Surveys; DE, Department of Education; DHS, Department of Health Services; MSA, Master Settlement Agreement

Keywords: adolescent smoking; tobacco control; young adult smoking


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Alesci, N. L., Forster, J. L., Erickson, D. J. (2009). Did youth smoking behaviors change before and after the shutdown of Minnesota Youth Tobacco Prevention Initiative?. Nicotine Tob Res 11: 1196-1204 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bondy, S J, Victor, J C, Diemert, L M (2009). Origin and use of the 100 cigarette criterion in tobacco surveys. Tobacco Control 18: 317-323 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gilpin, E. A., White, M. M., Messer, K., Pierce, J. P. (2007). Receptivity to Tobacco Advertising and Promotions Among Young Adolescents as a Predictor of Established Smoking in Young Adulthood. AJPH 97: 1489-1495 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Al-Delaimy, W. K, Pierce, J. P, Messer, K., White, M. M, Trinidad, D. R, Gilpin, E. A (2007). The California Tobacco Control Program's effect on adult smokers: (2) Daily cigarette consumption levels. Tobacco Control 16: 91-95 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Trinidad, D. R, Messer, K., Gilpin, E. A, Al-Delaimy, W. K, White, M. M, Pierce, J. P (2007). The California Tobacco Control Program's effect on adult smokers: (3) Similar effects for African Americans across states. Tobacco Control 16: 96-100 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gilpin, E. A, Messer, K., White, M. M, Pierce, J. P (2006). What contributed to the major decline in per capita cigarette consumption during California's comprehensive tobacco control programme?. Tobacco Control 15: 308-316 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cokkinides, V., Bandi, P., Ward, E., Jemal, A., Thun, M. (2006). Progress and opportunities in tobacco control.. CA Cancer J Clin 56: 135-142 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hersey, J C, Niederdeppe, J, Ng, S W, Mowery, P, Farrelly, M, Messeri, P (2005). How state counter-industry campaigns help prime perceptions of tobacco industry practices to promote reductions in youth smoking. Tobacco Control 14: 377-383 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.