HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pierce, J P Articles by Gilpin, E A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pierce, J P Articles by Gilpin, E A Related Collections Smoking Tobacco use (youth)

Adolescent smoking decline during California’s tobacco control programme

Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Rebecca and John Moores UCSD Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA

Correspondence to:
John P Pierce
PhD, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Ca 92093-0645, USA; jppierce{at}ucsd.edu

Objective: California’s comprehensive tobacco control programme was 13 years old in 2002; by then, children entering adolescence at the start of the programme were young adults. This study examines whether adolescent smoking declined over this period, whether any decline carried through to young adulthood, and whether it was specific to California.

Setting and participants: Most data were from the 1990–2002 California Tobacco Surveys (CTS) (adolescents 12–17 years, > 5000/survey, young adults 18–24 years, > 1000/survey). Additional data were from the national 1992/93–2001/02 Current Population Survey (CPS) (young adults 18–24 years, > 15 000/survey).

Results: Over the 13 year period in California, ever puffing declined by 70% in 12–13 year olds, by 53% in 14–15 year olds from 1992–2002, and by 34% in 16–17 year olds from 1996–2002 (CTS). As noted, the decline commenced progressively later in each older group. Smoking experimentation (1+ cigarettes) and established smoking (> 100 cigarettes in lifetime) showed similar patterns. Compared to 1990, the percentage of California young adults (CTS data) who ever experimented declined by 14%, with half of the decline from 1999–2002. CPS young adult smoking prevalence (established and now smoke everyday or some days) was constant in the rest of the USA over the entire period, but California showed a recent 18% decline from 1998/99 to 2001/02.

Conclusions: California’s comprehensive programme may have kept new adolescent cohorts from experimenting with cigarettes. Low young adolescent experimentation rates at programme start appeared to carry through to young adulthood, resulting in a recent drop in young adult smoking prevalence in California not observed in the rest of the USA.

Abbreviations: CPS, Current Population Survey; CTS, California Tobacco Surveys; DE, Department of Education; DHS, Department of Health Services; MSA, Master Settlement Agreement

Keywords: adolescent smoking; tobacco control; young adult smoking

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. A. Gilpin, M. M. White, K. Messer, and J. P. Pierce Receptivity to Tobacco Advertising and Promotions Among Young Adolescents as a Predictor of Established Smoking in Young Adulthood Am J Public Health, August 1, 2007; 97(8): 1489 - 1495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. K Al-Delaimy, J. P Pierce, K. Messer, M. M White, D. R Trinidad, and E. A Gilpin The California Tobacco Control Program's effect on adult smokers: (2) Daily cigarette consumption levels Tob. Control, April 1, 2007; 16(2): 91 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. R Trinidad, K. Messer, E. A Gilpin, W. K Al-Delaimy, M. M White, and J. P Pierce The California Tobacco Control Program's effect on adult smokers: (3) Similar effects for African Americans across states Tob. Control, April 1, 2007; 16(2): 96 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A Gilpin, K. Messer, M. M White, and J. P Pierce What contributed to the major decline in per capita cigarette consumption during California's comprehensive tobacco control programme? Tob. Control, August 1, 2006; 15(4): 308 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Cokkinides, P. Bandi, E. Ward, A. Jemal, and M. Thun Progress and opportunities in tobacco control. CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2006; 56(3): 135 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J C Hersey, J Niederdeppe, S W Ng, P Mowery, M Farrelly, and P Messeri How state counter-industry campaigns help prime perceptions of tobacco industry practices to promote reductions in youth smoking Tob. Control, December 1, 2005; 14(6): 377 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]