RESEARCH PAPER

Changes in hospitality workers’ exposure to secondhand smoke following the implementation of New York’s smoke-free law

M C Farrelly¹, J M Nonnemaker¹, R Chou¹, A Hyland², K K Peterson¹ and U E Bauer³

¹ RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
² Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
³ New York State Department of Health, City?, New York, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Matthew C Farrelly
RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA; mcf{at}rti.org

Objective: To assess the impact on hospitality workers’ exposure to secondhand smoke of New York’s smoke-free law that prohibits smoking in all places of employment, including restaurants, bars, and bowling facilities.

Design: Pre-post longitudinal follow up design.

Settings: Restaurants, bars, and bowling facilities in New York State.

Subjects: At baseline, 104 non-smoking workers in restaurants, bars, and bowling facilities were recruited with newspaper ads, flyers, and radio announcements. Of these, 68 completed a telephone survey and provided at least one saliva cotinine specimen at baseline. At three, six, and 12 month follow up studies, 47, 38, and 32 workers from the baseline sample of 68 completed a telephone survey and provided at least one saliva cotinine specimen.

Intervention: The smoke-free law went into effect 24 July 2003.

Main outcome measures: Self reported sensory and respiratory symptoms and exposure to secondhand smoke; self administered saliva cotinine specimens. Analyses were limited to subjects in all four study periods who completed a telephone survey and provided at least one saliva cotinine specimen.

Results: All analyses were limited to participants who completed both an interview and a saliva specimen for all waves of data collection (n = 30) and who had cotinine concentrations 15 ng/ml (n = 24). Hours of exposure to secondhand smoke in hospitality jobs decreased from 12.1 hours (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.0 to 16.3 hours) to 0.2 hours (95% CI –0.1 to 0.5 hours) (p < 0.01) and saliva cotinine concentration decreased from 3.6 ng/ml (95% CI 2.6 to 4.7 ng/ml) to 0.8 ng/ml (95% CI 0.4 to 1.2 ng/ml) (p < 0.01) from baseline to the 12 month follow up. The prevalence of workers reporting sensory symptoms declined from 88% (95% CI 66% to 96%) to 38% (95% CI 20% to 59%) (p < 0.01); there was no change in the overall prevalence of upper respiratory symptoms (p < 0.16).

Conclusion: New York’s smoke-free law had its intended effect of protecting hospitality workers from exposure to secondhand smoke within three months of implementation. One year after implementation, the results suggest continued compliance with the law.

Keywords: secondhand smoke; hospitality; ban; restriction

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Bannon, F., Devlin, A., McElwee, G., Gavin, A. (2009). Greater gains from smoke-free legislation for non-smoking bar staff in Belfast. Eur J Public Health 0: ckp087v1-ckp087 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Van Deusen, A., Hyland, A., Travers, M. J., Wang, C., Higbee, C., King, B. A., Alford, T., Cummings, K. M. (2009). Secondhand smoke and particulate matter exposure in the home. Nicotine Tob Res 11: 635-641 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• McKee, S. A., Higbee, C., O'Malley, S., Hassan, L., Borland, R., Cummings, K. M., Hastings, G., Fong, G. T., Hyland, A. (2009). Longitudinal evaluation of smoke-free Scotland on pub and home drinking behavior: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project. Nicotine Tob Res 11: 619-626 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pyles, M K, Hahn, E J (2009). Smoke-free legislation and charitable gaming in Kentucky. Tobacco Control 18: 60-62 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gotz, N. K., van Tongeren, M., Wareing, H., Wallace, L. M., Semple, S., MacCalman, L. (2008). Changes in air quality and second-hand smoke exposure in hospitality sector businesses after introduction of the English Smoke-free legislation. J Public Health (Oxf) 30: 421-428 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hyland, A, Travers, M J, Dresler, C, Higbee, C, Cummings, K M (2008). A 32-country comparison of tobacco smoke derived particle levels in indoor public places. Tobacco Control 17: 159-165 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Proescholdbell, S K, Foley, K L, Johnson, J, Malek, S H (2008). Indoor air quality in prisons before and after implementation of a smoking ban law. Tobacco Control 17: 123-127 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• (2007). Reduced Secondhand Smoke Exposure After Implementation of a Comprehensive Statewide Smoking Ban New York, June 26, 2003 June 30, 2004. JAMA 298: 1392-1394 [Full Text]  
• Stark, M. J., Rohde, K., Maher, J. E., Pizacani, B. A., Dent, C. W., Bard, R., Carmella, S. G., Benoit, A. R., Thomson, N. M., Hecht, S. S. (2007). The Impact of Clean Indoor Air Exemptions and Preemption Policies on the Prevalence of a Tobacco-Specific Lung Carcinogen Among Nonsmoking Bar and Restaurant Workers. Am. J. Public Health 97: 1457-1463 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fernando, D., Fowles, J., Woodward, A., Christophersen, A., Dickson, S., Hosking, M., Berezowski, R., Lea, R. A (2007). Legislation reduces exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke in New Zealand bars by about 90%. Tobacco Control 16: 235-238 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Menzies, D., Nair, A., Williamson, P. A., Schembri, S., Al-Khairalla, M. Z. H., Barnes, M., Fardon, T. C., McFarlane, L., Magee, G. J., Lipworth, B. J. (2006). Respiratory symptoms, pulmonary function, and markers of inflammation among bar workers before and after a legislative ban on smoking in public places.. JAMA 296: 1742-1748 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Eisner, M. D. (2006). Banning smoking in public places: time to clear the air.. JAMA 296: 1778-1779 [Full Text]  
• Jaakkola, M. S., Jaakkola, J. J. K. (2006). Impact of smoke-free workplace legislation on exposures and health: possibilities for prevention.. Eur Respir J 28: 397-408 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pickett, M. S, Schober, S. E, Brody, D. J, Curtin, L. R, Giovino, G. A (2006). Smoke-free laws and secondhand smoke exposure in US non-smoking adults, 1999-2002.. Tobacco Control 15: 302-307 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Eisner, M. D., Forastiere, F. (2006). Passive smoking, lung function, and public health.. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 173: 1184-1185 [Full Text]  
• Glantz, F. K., Glantz, S. A. (2006). Protecting Europeans from secondhand smoke: time to act. Eur Heart J 27: 382-383 [Full Text]  
• Gallus, S., Zuccaro, P., Colombo, P., Apolone, G., Pacifici, R., Garattini, S., La Vecchia, C. (2006). Effects of new smoking regulations in Italy. Ann Oncol 17: 346-347 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Allwright, S., Paul, G., Greiner, B., Mullally, B. J, Pursell, L., Kelly, A., Bonner, B., D'Eath, M., McConnell, B., McLaughlin, J. P, O'Donovan, D., O'Kane, E., Perry, I. J (2005). Legislation for smoke-free workplaces and health of bar workers in Ireland: before and after study. BMJ 331: 1117- [Abstract] [Full Text]