RESEARCH PAPER
The perimetric boycott: a tool for tobacco control advocacy
University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Naphtali Offen
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences Box 0612, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA; naphtali.offen{at}ucsf.edu
Objectives: To propose criteria to help advocates: (1) determine when tobacco related boycotts may be useful; (2) select appropriate targets; and (3) predict and measure boycott success.
Methods: Analysis of tobacco focused boycotts retrieved from internal tobacco industry documents websites and other scholarship on boycotts.
Results: Tobacco related boycotts may be characterised by boycott target and reason undertaken. Most boycotts targeted the industry itself and were called for political or economic reasons unrelated to tobacco disease, often resulting in settlements that gave the industry marketing and public relations advantages. Even a lengthy health focused boycott of tobacco industry food subsidiaries accomplished little, making demands the industry was unlikely to meet. In contrast, a perimetric boycott (targeting institutions at the perimeter of the core target) of an organisation that was taking tobacco money mobilised its constituency and convinced the organisation to end the practice.
Conclusions: Direct boycotts of the industry have rarely advanced tobacco control. Perimetric boycotts of industry allies offer advocates a promising tool for further marginalising the industry. Successful boycotts include a focus on the public health consequences of tobacco use; an accessible point of pressure; a mutual interest between the target and the boycotters; realistic goals; and clear and measurable demands.
Abbreviations: ACT-UP, AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power; APHA, American Public Health Association; BAT, British American Tobacco; B&W, Brown and Williamson; CLASH, Coalition of Lavender-Americans on Smoking and Health; GASP, Georgians Against Smoking Pollution; GLAAD, Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation; LGBT, lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender; PM, Philip Morris; RJR, RJ Reynolds; STAT, Stop Teenage Addiction to Tobacco
Keywords: advocacy; boycotts; industry documents; tobacco control
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Wander, N., Malone, R. E
(2006). Making Big Tobacco Give In: You Lose, They Win. AJPH
96: 2048-2054
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Wander, N, Malone, R E
(2006). Fiscal versus social responsibility: how Philip Morris shaped the public funds divestment debate. Tobacco Control
15: 231-241
[Abstract] [Full Text]
eLetters:
Read all eLetters
- Untitled
- Patti Lynn
- Tobacco Control Online, 16 Nov 2005 [Full text]
- A CALL TO ACTION
- VICTOR O KOLADE
- Tobacco Control Online, 10 Mar 2006 [Full text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
