Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Tobacco Control 2005;14:284-286; doi:10.1136/tc.2004.010009
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, N
Right arrow Articles by Cameron, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, N
Right arrow Articles by Cameron, G

BRIEF REPORT

The effectiveness of television advertising campaigns on generating calls to a national Quitline by Maori

N Wilson1, M Grigg2, L Graham3, G Cameron2

1 Wellington School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Wellington, New Zealand
2 The Quit Group, Wellington, New Zealand
3 Graham Strategic, Wellington, New Zealand

Correspondence to:
Dr Nick Wilson
Wellington School of Medicine & Health Sciences, PO Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand; nwilson{at}actrix.gen.nz


ABSTRACT
Objective: To examine the effectiveness of four mass media campaigns on calls to a national Quitline by Maori (the indigenous people of New Zealand).

Methods: Monthly Quitline call data and calls within one hour of a television commercial (TVC) being shown were analysed for the 2002–2003 period. Data on target audience rating points (TARPs) and expenditure on TVCs were also used (n = 2319 TVC placements).

Results: Maori were found to register with the Quitline at higher rates during the most intense six campaign months (15% more registrations compared to less intense months). The most effective campaign generated 115 calls per 100 TARPs by Maori callers within one hour of TVC airing (the "Every cigarette" campaign). A more Maori orientated campaign with both health and cultural themes generated 91 calls per 100 TARPs from Maori callers. For these two campaigns combined, the advertising cost per new registration with the Quitline by a Maori caller was $NZ30–48. Two second hand smoke campaigns that did not show the Quitline number were much less effective at 25 and 45 calls per 100 TARPs.

Conclusions: These television advertising campaigns were effective and cost effective in generating calls to a national Quitline by Maori. Health authorities should continue to explore the use of both "threat appeal" style media campaigns and culturally appropriate campaigns to support Quitline use by indigenous peoples.


Abbreviations: EC, "Every cigarette is doing you damage"; IAW, "Its about whanau"; SHS, secondhand smoke; TARPs, target audience rating points; TVC, television commercial

Keywords: smoking cessation; Quitline; Maori; indigenous people; advertising campaign




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
M. C Farrelly, A. Hussin, and U. E Bauer
Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of television, radio and print advertisements in promoting the New York smokers' quitline
Tob. Control, December 1, 2007; 16(Suppl_1): i21 - i23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
J. F Hollis, T. A McAfee, J. L Fellows, S. M Zbikowski, M. Stark, and K. Riedlinger
The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of telephone counselling and the nicotine patch in a state tobacco quitline
Tob. Control, December 1, 2007; 16(Suppl_1): i53 - i59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.