Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Tobacco Control 2005;14:307-314; doi:10.1136/tc.2005.011775
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lam, T-H
Right arrow Articles by Aharonson-Daniel, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lam, T-H
Right arrow Articles by Aharonson-Daniel, L
Related Collections
Right arrow Smoking
Right arrow Health effects of tobacco use
Right arrow Environmental tobacco smoke

RESEARCH PAPER

Secondhand smoke and respiratory ill health in current smokers

T-H Lam1, L-M Ho1, A J Hedley1, P Adab2, R Fielding1, S M McGhee1, G M Leung1, L Aharonson-Daniel3

1 Department of Community Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
2 Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
3 Israel Center for Trauma and Emergency Medicine Research, The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel

Correspondence to:
Dr Lai-Ming Ho
Department of Community Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 21 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong; lmho{at}hkucc.hku.hk

Background: Numerous studies have concluded that secondhand smoke (SHS) is harmful to non-smokers but controversy persists regarding its effects on smokers. The impact of SHS exposure on the acute respiratory health of current active smokers was examined using a cross sectional design.

Methods: 9923 uniformed staff in the Hong Kong Police Force completed a standardised questionnaire on current and past smoking, SHS exposure at home and at work, acute respiratory symptoms, and recent physician consultation. 3999 male current smokers were included in the analysis.

Results: About 5% of the smokers were exposed to SHS at home only, 53% were exposed at work only, and 30% were exposed both at home and at work. The prevalence ratios for respiratory symptoms (throat and nasal problems, cough, phlegm, and wheeze), physician consultation, and self medication were higher for those who were exposed to SHS at home or at work. The odds ratios of reporting one or more respiratory symptoms, for SHS exposures at home or at work, were 1.33 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12 to 1.59) and 1.66 (95% CI 1.36 to 2.02) respectively, after adjusting for age, marital status, education, rank and duties, exposure to self perceived dusty or polluted environment in previous job, and total dose of active smoking. The adjusted odds ratios showed significant positive dose–response gradients with SHS exposure at home, at work, and at both places combined.

Conclusions: SHS exposure is strongly associated with increased acute respiratory symptoms and recent outpatient service utilisation in current smokers. If the association is causal, public health action to limit SHS exposure could also benefit smokers.


Keywords: secondhand smoke; respiratory health; smokers; Hong Kong; Chinese




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
A. J. Hedley, S. M. McGhee, J. L. Repace, L.-C. Wong, M. Y. S. Yu, T.-W. Wong, and T.-H. Lam
Risks for Heart Disease and Lung Cancer from Passive Smoking by Workers in the Catering Industry
Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2006; 90(2): 539 - 548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
K Jamrozik
Slaying myths about passive smoking
Tob. Control, October 1, 2005; 14(5): 294 - 295.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.