Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Tobacco Control 2005;14:338-345; doi:10.1136/tc.2004.010637
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barbeau, E M
Right arrow Articles by Balbach, E D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barbeau, E M
Right arrow Articles by Balbach, E D
Related Collections
Right arrow Smoking
Right arrow Health effects of tobacco use

RESEARCH PAPER

From strange bedfellows to natural allies: the shifting allegiance of fire service organisations in the push for federal fire-safe cigarette legislation

E M Barbeau1, G Kelder1, S Ahmed2, V Mantuefel2, E D Balbach2

1 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
2 Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA

Correspondence to:
Professor Elizabeth M Barbeau
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA; elizabeth_barbeau{at}dfci.harvard.edu

Background: Cigarettes are the leading cause of fatal fires in the USA and are associated with one in four fire deaths. Although the technology needed to make fire-safe cigarettes has been available for many years, progress has been slow on legislative and regulatory fronts to require the tobacco industry to manufacture fire-safe cigarettes.

Method and results: We conducted a case study, drawing on data from tobacco industry documents, archives, and key informant interviews to investigate tobacco industry strategies for thwarting fire-safe cigarette legislation in the US Congress. We apply a theoretical framework that posits that policymaking is the product of three sets of forces: interests, institutions, and ideas, to examine tobacco industry behaviour, with a special focus on their and others’ attempts to court fire service organisations, including firefighters’ unions as allies. We discuss the implications of our findings for future policy efforts related to fire-safe cigarettes and other tobacco control issues.

Conclusions: Tobacco control advocates ought to: continue efforts to align key interest groups, including the firefighters unions; contest tobacco industry "diversionary" science tactics; and pursue a state based legislative strategy for fire-safe cigarettes, building towards national legislation.


Abbreviations: CPSC, Consumer Product Safety Commission; NFIRS, National Fire Incident Reporting System; NFPA, National Fire Protection Association; OSHA, Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Keywords: fire-safe cigarettes; legislation; organised labour




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
E D Balbach and E M Barbeau
Beyond quagmires: the evolving quality of documents research
Tob. Control, December 1, 2005; 14(6): 361 - 362.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.