Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Tobacco Control 2005;14:377-383; doi:10.1136/tc.2004.010785
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

REVIEW

How state counter-industry campaigns help prime perceptions of tobacco industry practices to promote reductions in youth smoking

J C Hersey1, J Niederdeppe1, S W Ng1, P Mowery1,*, M Farrelly1 and P Messeri2,{dagger}

1 RTI International, Washington, DC, USA
2 American Legacy Foundation, Washington DC

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
James Hersey
PhD, RTI International, 1615 M Street, NW, Suite 740, Washington, DC 20036, USA; hersey{at}rti.org

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study assessed the impact of state media campaigns that prominently feature counter-industry messages on youth cigarette smoking, beyond the effects of price, secular trends, tobacco control efforts, and the national truth® campaign.

Methods: Rates of youth smoking were compared in three groups of states: (1) those with long funded counter-industry campaigns (California, Florida, and Massachusetts); (2) states with more recently funded counter-industry media campaigns (Indiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, and New Jersey); and (3) other states. An analysis was performed for a series of national telephone surveys of 12–17 year olds between 1999 and 2002, controlling for differences in demographic background, the price of cigarettes, and exposure to the national truth® campaign.

Results: Between 1999 and 2002, rates of current smoking and established smoking decreased significantly faster in states with established or more newly funded counter-industry campaigns than in other states. State counter-industry campaigns appear to prime, or make more salient, negative perceptions about tobacco industry practices.

Conclusion: Results highlight the value of continued state counter-industry campaigns.

Abbreviations: CA, California; CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; FL, Florida; GRP, gross ratings point; IN, Indiana; LMTS, Legacy Media Tracking Survey; MA, Massachusetts; MN, Minnesota; MS, Mississippi; NJ, New Jersey; REBEL, Reaching Everyone by Exposing Lies; SWAT, Students Working Against Tobacco; TUPE, tobacco use prevention education

Keywords: counter-advertising campaigns; youth smoking prevention; state media campaigns; comprehensive tobacco control; priming effects


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Klesges, R. C., Sherrill-Mittleman, D. A., DeBon, M., Talcott, G. W., Vanecek, R. J. (2009). Do we believe the tobacco industry lied to us? Association with smoking behavior in a military population. Health Educ Res 0: cyp029v1-cyp029 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.