Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Tobacco Control 2005;14(Supplement 1 ):i10-i15; doi:10.1136/tc.2003.005637
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Tobacco Control 2005;14:i10-i15
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

RESEARCH PAPER

Role of parents and peers in influencing the smoking status of high school students in Taiwan

C P Wen1, S P Tsai2, T Y Cheng1, C C Hsu1, T Chen3, H S Lin4

1 Division of Health Policy Research, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan
2 The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, USA
3 Tulane University School of Public Health, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
4 Department of Public Health, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Chi Pang Wen
National Health Research Institutes, 35 Keyan Road, Zhunan Town, Miaoli County, Taiwan 350; cwengood{at}nhri.org.tw

Objectives: To assess parental influence on smoking behaviour by high school students in an Asian culture and to compare the relative importance of parental and peer influence.

Methods: A 5% nationally representative sample, including 44 976 high school students in 10th to 12th grade (aged 15–18 years) in Taiwan, were surveyed in 1995. Each completed a long self administered questionnaire. Parental influence was measured by examining both parental behaviour (smoking status) and attitudes (perceived "tender loving care" (TLC) by adolescents). Changes in smoking status were used to determine peer influence, defined as the increase in the likelihood of smoking from grade 10 to 12 in a steady state environment. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for parental and peer influence, using logistic regression.

Results: Adolescents of smoking parents with low TLC had the highest smoking rates and those of non-smoking parents with high TLC had the lowest. The difference was more than twofold in boys and more than fourfold in girls. When either parental smoking status or TLC alone was considered, parental influence was similar to peer influence in boys, but larger than peer influence in girls. However, when smoking status and TLC were considered jointly, it became larger than peer influence for both groups (OR 2.8 v 1.8 for boys and OR 3.9 v 1.3 for girls).

Conclusion: When parental influence is taken as parental behaviour and attitude together, it plays a more important role than peer influence in smoking among high school students in Taiwan. This study, characterising such relationships among Asian populations for the first time, implies that future prevention programmes should direct more efforts toward the parental smoking and parent–child relationships, and not aim exclusively at adolescents in schools.

Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; RR, rate ratio, TLC, tender loving care

Keywords: youth smoking; parental influence; peer influence; parental attitude; parental smoking; peer selection


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Wen, C P (2005). Facilitating the critical process in tobacco control. Tobacco Control 14: i1-i3 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.