Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Tobacco Control 2005;14(Supplement 2 ):ii8-ii13; doi:10.1136/tc.2005.012591
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, S
Right arrow Articles by Liberman, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, S
Right arrow Articles by Liberman, J
Related Collections
Right arrow Economics of tobacco use and control

RESEARCH PAPER

Ensuring smokers are adequately informed: reflections on consumer rights, manufacturer responsibilities, and policy implications

S Chapman1, J Liberman2

1 School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
2 VicHealth Centre for Tobacco Control, The Cancer Council Victoria, Victoria, Australia

Correspondence to:
Professor Simon Chapman
School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Building A27, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; simonchapman{at}health.usyd.edu.au

The right to information is a fundamental consumer value. Following the advent of health warnings, the tobacco industry has repeatedly asserted that smokers are fully informed of the risks they take, while evidence demonstrates widespread superficial levels of awareness and understanding. There remains much that tobacco companies could do to fulfil their responsibilities to inform smokers. We explore issues involved in the meaning of "adequately informed" smoking and discuss some of the key policy and regulatory implications. We use the idea of a smoker licensing scheme—under which it would be illegal to sell to smokers who had not demonstrated an adequate level of awareness—as a device to explore some of these issues. We also explore some of the difficulties that addiction poses for the notion that smokers might ever voluntarily assume the risks of smoking.


Keywords: tobacco; smoking; licensing; addiction




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
S. M Carter and S. Chapman
Smokers and non-smokers talk about regulatory options in tobacco control.
Tob. Control, October 1, 2006; 15(5): 398 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
B J Fox
Framing tobacco control efforts within an ethical context
Tob. Control, August 1, 2005; 14(suppl_2): ii38 - ii44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.