REVIEW

Industry sponsored anti-smoking ads and adolescent reactance: test of a boomerang effect

L Henriksen, A L Dauphinee, Y Wang, S P Fortmann

Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Lisa Henriksen
Stanford Prevention Research Center, Hoover Pavilion, Room N145, 211 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA 94305-5705, USA; lhenriksen{at}stanford.edu

Objective: To examine whether adolescents’ exposure to youth smoking prevention ads sponsored by tobacco companies promotes intentions to smoke, curiosity about smoking, and positive attitudes toward the tobacco industry.

Design: A randomised controlled experiment compared adolescents’ responses to five smoking prevention ads sponsored by a tobacco company (Philip Morris or Lorillard), or to five smoking prevention ads sponsored by a non-profit organisation (the American Legacy Foundation), or to five ads about preventing drunk driving.

Setting: A large public high school in California’s central valley.

Subjects: A convenience sample of 9th and 10th graders (n = 832) ages 14–17 years.

Main outcome measures: Perceptions of ad effectiveness, intention to smoke, and attitudes toward tobacco companies measured immediately after exposure.

Results: As predicted, adolescents rated Philip Morris and Lorillard ads less favourably than the other youth smoking prevention ads. Adolescents’ intention to smoke did not differ as a function of ad exposure. However, exposure to Philip Morris and Lorillard ads engendered more favourable attitudes toward tobacco companies.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that industry sponsored anti-smoking ads do more to promote corporate image than to prevent youth smoking. By cultivating public opinion that is more sympathetic toward tobacco companies, the effect of such advertising is likely to be more harmful than helpful to youth.

Abbreviations: HRS, Hong reactance scale; TRS, therapeutic reactance scale

Keywords: advertising; adolescents; reactance; tobacco industry

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Apollonio, D. E., Malone, R. E. (2009). Turning negative into positive: public health mass media campaigns and negative advertising. Health Educ Res 24: 483-495 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bijvank, M. N., Konijn, E. A., Bushman, B. J., Roelofsma, P. H. M. P. (2009). Age and Violent-Content Labels Make Video Games Forbidden Fruits for Youth. Pediatrics 123: 870-876 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Farrelly, M. C., Davis, K. C., Duke, J., Messeri, P. (2009). Sustaining 'truth': changes in youth tobacco attitudes and smoking intentions after 3 years of a national antismoking campaign. Health Educ Res 24: 42-48 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Barg, F K, Keddem, S, Ginsburg, K R, Winston, F K (2009). Teen perceptions of good drivers and safe drivers: implications for reaching adolescents. Inj. Prev. 15: 24-29 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sebrie, E. M., Glantz, S. A. (2007). Attempts to Undermine Tobacco Control: Tobacco Industry "Youth Smoking Prevention" Programs to Undermine Meaningful Tobacco Control in Latin America. AJPH 97: 1357-1367 [Abstract] [Full Text]