RESEARCH PAPER

New tobacco products: do smokers like them?

R S Caraballo, L L Pederson, N Gupta

Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Ralph C Carabello
Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, Mail Stop K-50, 4770 Buford Highway, NE, Atlanta, GA 30341-3724, USA; rfc8{at}cdc.gov

Background: There is little information about smokers who tried potentially reduced exposure products (PREPs) (Eclipse^®, Omni^®, Advance Lights^®, Accord^®, or Ariva^®), why they tried them, if they liked these products, and if they will continue to use them.

Objectives: The objectives of this qualitative study were to understand: (1) how smokers who tried PREPs learned about them, (2) reasons for first trying PREPs, (3) which PREP(s) they tried, (4) what they thought of the product at first trial, (5) reasons for continuing or discontinuing use, and (6) whether they would recommend PREPs to others.

Design: In October 2002, 16 focus group sessions were conducted with current cigarette smokers aged 30–50 years: eight groups in Chattanooga, Tennessee, and eight in Dallas, Texas. Specific focus groups were composed of white men, white women, African American men, African American women, Hispanic men, or Hispanic women.

Results: The majority of the participants learned about PREPs through advertising or promotion, family, friends, and co-workers; major reasons given for first trying PREPs were that the products were free or inexpensive, they wanted to stop smoking, they believed the product claims of fewer health risks, or they were curious; most of them tried Eclipse^® probably because the focus groups were conducted in the same cities where Eclipse^® was introduced; most participants did not like PREPs; most discontinued the use of PREPS, some who continued to use them did so infrequently and also kept smoking their regular brands of cigarettes; and most would not recommend PREPs, although a few might recommend them to specific groups (for example, new smokers, the young, women, curious or health conscious people).

Conclusions: Although most established smokers did not like the PREPs they tried and will not recommend them to anyone, a minority of established smokers believe that there may be a market for these products.

Keywords: potentially reduced-exposure products; PREPs; focus groups; smokers; race/ethnicity; sex

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Parascandola, M., Augustson, E., O'Connell, M. E., Marcus, S. (2009). Consumer awareness and attitudes related to new potential reduced-exposure tobacco product brands. Nicotine Tob Res 11: 886-895 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kreslake, J. M., Wayne, G. F., Alpert, H. R., Koh, H. K., Connolly, G. N. (2008). Tobacco Industry Control of Menthol in Cigarettes and Targeting of Adolescents and Young Adults. AJPH 98: 1685-1692 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Chen, A., Glantz, S., Tong, E. (2007). Asian herbal-tobacco cigarettes: "not medicine but less harmful"?. Tobacco Control 16: e3-e3 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

"Harm reduction?" seduction

Stephen L. Hansen,MD

Tobacco Control Online, 27 Jan 2006 [Full text]

A Safer Cigarette

Henry Jones

Tobacco Control Online, 24 Mar 2006 [Full text]