HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Read responses to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Caraballo, R S Articles by Gupta, N Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Caraballo, R S Articles by Gupta, N

New tobacco products: do smokers like them?

Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Correspondence to:
Dr Ralph C Carabello
Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, Mail Stop K-50, 4770 Buford Highway, NE, Atlanta, GA 30341-3724, USA; rfc8{at}cdc.gov

Background: There is little information about smokers who tried potentially reduced exposure products (PREPs) (Eclipse^®, Omni^®, Advance Lights^®, Accord^®, or Ariva^®), why they tried them, if they liked these products, and if they will continue to use them.

Objectives: The objectives of this qualitative study were to understand: (1) how smokers who tried PREPs learned about them, (2) reasons for first trying PREPs, (3) which PREP(s) they tried, (4) what they thought of the product at first trial, (5) reasons for continuing or discontinuing use, and (6) whether they would recommend PREPs to others.

Design: In October 2002, 16 focus group sessions were conducted with current cigarette smokers aged 30–50 years: eight groups in Chattanooga, Tennessee, and eight in Dallas, Texas. Specific focus groups were composed of white men, white women, African American men, African American women, Hispanic men, or Hispanic women.

Results: The majority of the participants learned about PREPs through advertising or promotion, family, friends, and co-workers; major reasons given for first trying PREPs were that the products were free or inexpensive, they wanted to stop smoking, they believed the product claims of fewer health risks, or they were curious; most of them tried Eclipse^® probably because the focus groups were conducted in the same cities where Eclipse^® was introduced; most participants did not like PREPs; most discontinued the use of PREPS, some who continued to use them did so infrequently and also kept smoking their regular brands of cigarettes; and most would not recommend PREPs, although a few might recommend them to specific groups (for example, new smokers, the young, women, curious or health conscious people).

Conclusions: Although most established smokers did not like the PREPs they tried and will not recommend them to anyone, a minority of established smokers believe that there may be a market for these products.

Keywords: potentially reduced-exposure products; PREPs; focus groups; smokers; race/ethnicity; sex

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. M. Kreslake, G. F. Wayne, H. R. Alpert, H. K. Koh, and G. N. Connolly Tobacco Industry Control of Menthol in Cigarettes and Targeting of Adolescents and Young Adults Am J Public Health, September 1, 2008; 98(9): 1685 - 1692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Chen, S. Glantz, and E. Tong Asian herbal-tobacco cigarettes: "not medicine but less harmful"? Tob. Control, April 1, 2007; 16(2): e3 - e3. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters: