Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Tobacco Control 2006;15:97-102; doi:10.1136/tc.2004.011049
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

RESEARCH PAPER

A group randomised trial of two methods for disseminating a smoking cessation programme to public antenatal clinics: effects on patient outcomes

E Campbell1, R A Walsh2, R Sanson-Fisher2, S Burrows1, E Stojanovski3

1 Hunter Population Health, Newcastle, Australia
2 Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Australia
3 Health Behaviour Research Collaboration, Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Australia

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Raoul Walsh
Centre for Health Research & Psycho-oncology (CHeRP), Locked Bag 10 Wallsend, Australia 2287; raoul.walsh{at}newcastle.edu.au

Objective: To assess the differential effectiveness of two methods of disseminating a smoking cessation programme to public hospital antenatal clinics.

Design: Group randomised trial.

Setting: 22 antenatal clinics in New South Wales, Australia.

Intervention: Clinics were allocated to a simple dissemination (SD) condition (11 clinics) which received a mail-out of programme resources or to an intensive dissemination (ID) condition (11 clinics) which included the mail-out plus feedback, training, and ongoing support with midwife facilitator.

Main outcome measures: Independent cross sectional surveys of women on a second or subsequent visit undertaken pre-dissemination and 18 months after dissemination. Outcomes were: (1) levels of smoking status assessment by clinic staff; (2) proportion of women identifying as having been smokers at their first visit who reported receiving cessation advice; (3) proportion of these women who had quit (self report and expired air carbon monoxide (CO)); and (4) smoking prevalence among all women (self report and CO).

Subjects: 5849 women pre-dissemination (2374 SD, 3475 ID) and weighted sample of 5145 women post-dissemination (2302 SD, 2843 ID).

Results: There were no significant differences between the groups on change on any outcome. Change in either group was minimal. In the post-dissemination survey, the cessation proportions were 6.4% (SD) and 10.5% (ID).

Conclusions: Relatively modest strategies for encouraging incorporation of smoking cessation activities into antenatal care were not effective in the long term. Alternative strategies should be implemented and evaluated. The findings reinforce the importance of a whole population approach to tobacco control.

Abbreviations: FSP, Fresh Start Program for You and Your Baby; ID, intensive dissemination; SD, simple dissemination

Keywords: smoking cessation intervention; pregnant women; antenatal clinic


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Freund, M., Campbell, E., Paul, C., Sakrouge, R., McElduff, P., Walsh, R. A., Wiggers, J., Knight, J., Girgis, A. (2009). Increasing smoking cessation care provision in hospitals: A meta-analysis of intervention effect. Nicotine Tob Res 11: 650-662 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.